PEDIATRICS Vol. 57 No. 4 April 1976, pp. 582
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kearsley, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hartmann, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kearsley, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hartmann, R.

Dr. Kearsley et al. Reply

Richard B. Kearsley M.D., Ph.D.1, Philip R. Zelazo Ph.D.1, Jerome Kagan Ph.D.1, and Rebecca Hartmann A.B.1

1 New England Medical Center Hospital, 171 Harrison Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02111

Dr. Palmeri acknowledges that the day-care experience described its our article was "qualitatively comparable" and "a good surrogate" for that of the home-reared child. He agrees that infant day care "...did not interfere with the maturation and emergence of that important developmental landmark, separation anxiety and protest." He recognizes, as do we, that thought and feeling are interwoven. He expresses concern that the comments offered in our paper "may induce pediatricians to take infant day care lightly...."