PEDIATRICS Vol. 56 No. 2 August 1975, pp. 160
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cassady, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cassady, G.

Perinatal outcome and referral age

George Cassady M.D.1

1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama, Medical Center University Station Birmingham, Alabama 35294

During the past decade, prompt application of new knowledge of perinatal pathophysiology has dramatically improved the quality of life for surviving tiny premature infants. The results of prompt correction and, when possible, prevention of such potent interrelated insults as hypoglycemia, asphyxia, hyperoxia, jaundice, shock, thirsting, and starvation have led the more optimistic of us to expect the virtual disappearance of neurologic residua, previously considered the unavoidable legacy of surviving premature infants. In contrast, the data reported by Fitzhardinge in this issue1 serve as an important warning that all may not be well with these babies. Certain flaws in this report—the 16% attrition rate (no follow-up), the inadequate description of the control group (no control DQ's), and the failure to objectively document such measureable influences on outcome as serum unconjugated bilirubin, serum osmolality, blood sugar, and Po2 and Pco2—should caution the reader to accept these findings only with liberal "grains of salt."