PEDIATRICS Vol. 55 No. 6 June 1975, pp. 753-755
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

Who and what

The modern exponential increase of scientific information in medicine has been accompanied by a distressing decline in skepticism. The growth of science owes much to Bacon's warning against uncritical acceptance of authoritative opinion, yet, paradoxically, in present-day medicine the voice of authority, as a result of the electronic revolution and the jet airplane, is louder and more broadly cast than ever. Who says what, is more important than what is said.

There are objective indicators of the increasing "personalization" of evidence. For example, the increasing attention paid to the identity of authors can be seen in the trend of the count of names credited to each original article published in Pediatrics over the past 26 years(fig.1).