PEDIATRICS Vol. 55 No. 2 February 1975, pp. 256
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bicknell, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bicknell, W. J.

PHYSICIAN'S ASSISTANTS

W. J. Bicknell

The U.S. primary-care assistant seems lost in a vicious circle: problems in the American health-care system (high cost and hospital orientation, lack of satisfaction for patient and provider with primary-health-care services, and the related maldistribution of physicians)—problems which might be mitigated by utilising physicians' assistants and nurse practitioners—themselves militate against effective use of such assistants. Financial incentives, educational systems, and traditional patterns of behavior and expectation all work in the opposite direction; all favour decisions which virtually preclude good primary care—maximum hospital usage, short physician visits, minimal delegation to non-physicians. There will have to be a substantial change in the U.S. system before physicians' assistants and nurse practitioners can begin to function well, and can hope to contribute to the quality, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of primary care.