PEDIATRICS Vol. 52 No. 3 September 1973, pp. 319-326
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Deisher, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Deisher, R. W.

CONTEMPORARY COMMUNAL CHILD REARING

A First Analysis

Charley M. Johnston B.S.1 and Robert W. Deisher M.D.1

1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

For children, the environment of the intentional community can provide important advantages that few nuclear families are in a position to give. With the dissolution of the extended family and with increasing personal and interpersonal alienation, these advantages are amplified. In the 20 communal groups visited, the observer found significant variation in the degree to which these potential advantages have come to be realized. In each, difficulties–personal, interpersonal and physical–have presented themselves. In the few instances where neither the biological parents nor the extended family of the commune has provided the necessary environment of basic trust, the children have evidenced this lack. Where major difficulties have been overcome and the commune members have been able to realize some of the potential advantages of communal child rearing, the reward has been children who demonstrate self-confidence, openness, warmth, independence and maturity.

Submitted on December 11, 1972
Accepted on May 15, 1973




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
E. A. Salzen
Social attachment and a sense of security -- A review
Social Science Information, August 1, 1978; 17(4-5): 555 - 627.