PEDIATRICS Vol. 51 No. 1 January 1973, pp. 11-16
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yankauer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yankauer, A.

THE CHILD HEALTH ASSOCIATE—WHAT'S IN A NAME?

Alfred Yankauer M.D.1

1 Department of Health Services Administration, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

"Physicians' Assistant," "Medex," "Limited Physician," "Feldsher," "Officier de Santé," "Behadar," "Hakim"—there are at least 19 different terms for the same job according to a recent WHO questionnaire.1 Now that six of the first nine graduates of Dr. Silver's program are at work2,3 the term Child Health Associate can be added to the glossary. Previously, perhaps in jest, Dr. Silver had proposed still other titles: the "Syniatrist Associate" and the "Syniatrist Assistant."4 Dr. R. A. Smith, the promoter of Medex, has proposed still another list: "Flexner," "Kruser" and "Osler," to name a few.5 It is possible that before too long the American language alone will have produced more than the 19 terms, unearthed in the recent world survey, as well as a few trainees to match each term.

All this semantic confusion does not even take into consideration newly coined terms that involve nursing: "Nurse Practitioner," "Nurse Associate," "Primex," etc. In spite of Dr. Silver's assertion to the contrary, and in spite of efforts by nursing leaders to preserve a nursing "identity,"6 it is very difficult to differentiate between job descriptions of the "Pediatric Nurse Associate" and the "Child Health Associate."

Nevertheless, neither jest nor a dissection of the research "evidence" from Colorado will serve to dismiss Dr. Silver's advocacy and Dr. Greeb's testimonial.7 Dr. Ross' frank and thoughtful reflections add weight to the charge to consider their implications seriously.8 The fact is that, whether we like it or not, a very substantial effort is now underway in the United States to train "physician extenders" or personnel with primary caretaking responsibilities that ten years ago would have been considered physician responsibilities.