PEDIATRICS Vol. 50 No. 6 December 1972, pp. 847-848
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haggerty, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haggerty, R. J.

PATIENT CARE AND STUDENT LEARNING IN A PEDIATRIC CLINIC

Robert J. Haggerty M.D.1

1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of, Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14620

Every pediatrician who has taught or worked in university pediatric outpatient departments recognizes the syndrome presented by Duff et al. in this issue of Pediatrics. The diagnosis is clear: effective student teaching is not occurring. The etiology of this problem is complex and not so clear. Some of the causes are inappropriate patient selection for beginning students, lack of effective administrative organization to achieve even limited teaching objectives, and lack of appropriate techniques to diagnose and manage the complex sociomedical problems presented. As a result, student, faculty, and patient dissatisfaction is very high. Effective management of the syndrome is even less clear.

As with most complex problems, a clearer definition of the goals is the first step to a solution. What do we want the student to learn?

How to gather information from families with such complex social and medical difficulties? Skills in diagnosis and management of common or rare health problems? Change of attitudes? Until each ambulatory program defines its teaching objectives more clearly in behaviorally measurable terms, effective management of the disease "poor patient care and teaching" will continue to elude us. I would, however, suggest the following considerations:

1. The first direct patient experiences which students have in ambulatory settings should be with patients who present considerably less complex problems than those available in most of our outpatient departments, and there should be a wider social class selection for the student's initial experience. To achieve this will require either a different patient recruitment procedure or the use of different settings for such education.