PEDIATRICS Vol. 50 No. 1 July 1972, pp. 160-162
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forsyth, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mindlin, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forsyth, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mindlin, R. L.

MALTREATMENT OF CHILDREN THE BATTERED CHILD SYNDROME

William B. Forsyth M.D., John E. Allen M.D., Joseph W. Brinkley M.D., Alice D. Chenoweth M.D., Gertrude Hunter M.D., Roland E. Miller M.D., A. Frederick North Jr. M.D., Patricia T. Schloesser M.D., Earl Siegel M.D., Marsden G. Wagner M.D., Talcott Bates M.D., Ann DeHuff Peters M.D., Ray E. Helfer M.D., Herman B. Marks M.D., and Rowland L. Mindlin M.D.1

1 American Public Health Association

In February 1966, the Committee on Infant and Preschool Child published a statement concerning the status of the problem of the battered child. The present Committee has reevaluated the statement in light of increased knowledge and experience over the past 6 years. The 1966 statement concerned itself primarily with two issues: (1) a historical review and definition of the battered child syndrome, and (2) discussion and recommendations concerning identification and protection of the abused child.

While a great deal of study and activity has taken place with regard to the problem of the battered child and there have been some positive results (e.g., every state in the union now has some form of reporting mechanism of the suspected or proven case of child abuse), the consensus of the Committee and its consultants is that the total problem has become magnified and is uncontrolled by present methods of management.

The Committee reaffirms and supports the following recommendations of the 1966 report:

1. Physicians should continue to be required to report suspected instances of child abuse immediately to the agency legally charged with the responsibility of investigating child abuse, preferably the county or state department of welfare or health or its local representatives, or to the nearest law enforcement agency.

2. The responsible agency must have ample personnel and resources to take action immediately on receipt of the report.

3. Reported cases should be evaluated promptly, and appropriate service should be provided for the child and family.

4. The child should be protected by the agency by continued hospitalization, supervision at home, or removal from home through family or juvenile court action.