PEDIATRICS Vol. 50 No. 1 July 1972, pp. 1-2
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tooley, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tooley, W. H.

WHAT IS THE RISK OF AN UMBILICAL ARTERY CATHETER?

William H. Tooley M.D.1

1 University of California—San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94122

In this issue of Pediatrics, Neal et al. report a 95% incidence of thrombosis with catheterization of an umbilical artery. Like the authors, I was surprised at this high rate of thrombus formation. It is, however, consistent with the experience of those who have studied the problem of deposition of thrombotic material on indwelling peripheral arterial catheters in children and adult patients. To some extent, the formation of a thrombus is dependent upon the composition of the catheter. Polyethylene, polyvinyl (from which the Argyle catheter is made), and polyurethane have rather rough surfaces and are quite thrombogenic. Nachmani et al. observed fibrin adhering to polyurethane catheters within 15 minutes of placement in an artery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
P. Monagle, A. Chan, P. Massicotte, E. Chalmers, and A. D. Michelson
Antithrombotic Therapy in Children*: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 645S - 687S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. H. Kim, Y. S. Lee, S. H. Kim, S.-K. Lee, M. K. Lim, and H. S. Kim
Does Umbilical Vein Catheterization Lead to Portal Venous Thrombosis? Prospective US Evaluation in 100 Neonates
Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 645 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
M. Rodriguez and I. Sosenko
Catheter-induced Aortic Thrombus Masquerading as Coarctation of the Aorta
Clinical Pediatrics, December 1, 1989; 28(12): 581 - 584.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
V.J. McGravey, C. Dabiri, and M.S. Bean
An Unusual Twist to Umbilical Artery Catheterization
Clinical Pediatrics, August 1, 1983; 22(8): 587 - 588.
[PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
R. D. Dorand, L. N. Cook, and B. F. Andrews
Umbilical Vessel Catheterization: The Low Incidence of Complications in a Series of 200 Newborn Infants
Clinical Pediatrics, June 1, 1977; 16(6): 569 - 572.
[PDF]