PEDIATRICS Vol. 49 No. 2 February 1972, pp. 287-290
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fanaroff, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Klaus, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fanaroff, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Klaus, M. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Follow-Up of Low Birth Weight Infants—The Predictive Value of Maternal Visiting Patterns

Avroy A. Fanaroff M.B. (RAND), M.R.C.P.E.1, John H. Kennell M.D.1, and Marshall H. Klaus M.D.1

1 Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

Present hospital regulations and the facilities for the care of high-risk infants often result in prolonged mother-infant separation, with restricted visiting and minimal physical contact. Reports of cases of child abuse and of infants who fail to thrive in the absence of organic disease reveal a disproportionately high incidence of prematurity. In the failure-to-thrive syndrome, 25 to 41% of the reported infants have been premature. Prematurity or serious illness in the newborn period resulting in maternal-infant separation was a feature in 23 to 31% of the battered infants. With such a high incidence of "mothering disorders" it is important to evaluate the mothers of high-risk infants carefully before discharge.

See table in the PDF file


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
R. Latva, L. Lehtonen, R. K. Salmelin, and T. Tamminen
Visiting Less Than Every Day: A Marker for Later Behavioral Problems in Finnish Preterm Infants
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2004; 158(12): 1153 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Mass
The Determinants of Parenthood: Power and Responsibility
Human Relations, March 1, 1997; 50(3): 241 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
School Psychology InternationalHome page
B. Pianta
Antecedents of Child Abuse: Single and Multiple Factor Models
School Psychology International, July 1, 1984; 5(3): 151 - 160.
[Abstract]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
A. E. Kopelman, R. J. Simeonsson, A. Smaldone, and L. Gilbert
Does a Photograph of a Newborn about to Be Transferred to an Intensive Care Center Promote Mother-infant Bonding?
Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 1978; 17(1): 15 - 16.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
E. Goldson, R. V. Cadol, M. J. Fitch, and H. J. Umlauf Jr
Nonaccidental Trauma and Failure to Thrive: A Sociomedical Profile in Denver
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 1976; 130(5): 490 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]