PEDIATRICS Vol. 48 No. 6 December 1971, pp. 902-906
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naeye, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tatter, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naeye, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tatter, D.

NEONATAL MORTALITY, THE MALE DISADVANTAGE

Richard L. Naeye M.D.1, Leslie S. Burt A.B.1, David L. Wright B.S.1, William A. Blanc M.D.1, and Dorothy Tatter M.D.1

1 Departments of Pathology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York; and Los Angeles County Hospital, Los Angeles

Male infants have an excessive risk of neonatal death by comparison with females. It has never been clear whether this male disadvantage is due to specific disease processes or is a general biologic feature of being male. In an analysis of 2,735 consecutive newborn autopsies, the ratio of males to females was 1.28:, which differs significantly from the 1.05:1 ratio for all U.S. livebirths. There was a near equal male to female ratio for most disorders in stillborn infants while disorders arising after birth demonstrated a strong male disadvantage. The still-born ratios presumably reflect a predominant maternal influence while birth and removal from the maternal environment uncovers an inherent biologic disadvantage of being male, a disadvantage not selectively related to specific disease processes. This nonspecificity is confirmed by the finding of several disorders in which sex ratios for stillborns are quite different than the ratios recorded for liveborn infants. The sex ratio for liveborn Caucasians was significantly greater than for nonwhites, and the nonpoor had a significantly greater ratio than the poor. About half of these differences appear related to a greater incidence of prenatal bacterial infections in the poor and nonwhites.

Submitted on March 27, 1971
Accepted on May 27, 1971




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. J.C. Mittnacht, M. Thanjan, S. Srivastava, U. Joashi, C. Bodian, S. Hossain, N. Kin, I. Hollinger, and K. Nguyen
Extubation in the operating room after congenital heart surgery in children
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2008; 136(1): 88 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
L. Bennet, L. C. Booth, N. Ahmed-Nasef, J. M. Dean, J. Davidson, J. S. Quaedackers, and A. J. Gunn
Male disadvantage? Fetal sex and cardiovascular responses to asphyxia in preterm fetal sheep
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1280 - R1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Child NeurolHome page
M. R. Golomb, P. T. Dick, D. L. MacGregor, R. Curtis, M. Sofronas, and G. A. deVeber
Neonatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke and Cerebral Sinovenous Thrombosis Are More Commonly Diagnosed in Boys
J Child Neurol, July 1, 2004; 19(7): 493 - 497.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. Cagnacci, A. Renzi, S. Arangino, C. Alessandrini, and A. Volpe
Influences of maternal weight on the secondary sex ratio of human offspring
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 442 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
J. L. Nunez and M. M. McCarthy
Estradiol Exacerbates Hippocampal Damage in a Model of Preterm Infant Brain Injury
Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2350 - 2359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. Cagnacci, A. Renzi, S. Arangino, C. Alessandrini, and A. Volpe
The male disadvantage and the seasonal rhythm of sex ratio at the time of conception
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 885 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
P Ashorn, K Maleta, M Espo, and T Kulmala
Male biased mortality among 1-2 year old children in rural Malawi
Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2002; 87(5): 386 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
D K Stevenson, J Verter, A A Fanaroff, W Oh, R A Ehrenkranz, S Shankaran, E F Donovan, L L Wright, J A Lemons, J E Tyson, et al.
Sex differences in outcomes of very low birthweight infants: the newborn male disadvantage
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2000; 83(3): 182F - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Journal of Family HistoryHome page
J. Knodel and S. De Vos
Preferences for the Sex of Offspring and Demographic Behavior in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Germany: an Examination of Evidence From Village Genealogies
Journal of Family History, June 1, 1980; 5(2): 145 - 166.
[PDF]