PEDIATRICS Vol. 45 No. 4 April 1970, pp. 623-627
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helfer, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helfer, R. E.

AN OBJECTIVE COMPARISON OF THE PEDIATRIC INTERVIEWING SKILLS OF FRESHMAN AND SENIOR MEDICAL STUDENTS

Ray E. Helfer M.D.1

1 University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver

The use of videotapes to observe senior medical students as they interviewed mothers of children has demonstrated a deficit in their ability to communicate with these parents. Seniors often fail to obtain the vital information pertaining to the child as an individual within a family unit. This study was performed to test the hypotheses that freshmen would obtain (1) more interpersonal and (2) less factual information from mothers of ill children than would seniors. Randomly selected freshmen and seniors videotaped interviews of three simulators who were programmed to portray mothers of a child with a serious organic illness with related psychosocial problems. The use of the programmed "mother" permitted each student to obtain a standardized interviewing experience. The students were given identical information about these children and informed that the mothers were simulators. Objective measurements were made by five trained observers who rated each videotape using a modified interaction analysis technique and an objective checklist of facts obtained. An interrater reliability coefficient for each group of ratings was high, rarely falling below 0.80.

The results clearly demonstrated that freshmen obtained significantly more interpersonal information (i.e., the affect of the illness upon the child and his family) and asked fewer leading questions than did seniors (p < 0.01). Seniors obtained more factual information (p < 0.001). The ramifications of these data are far reaching. It would appear that, as medical students move through their training, a certain degree of their innate ability communicate with mothers of ill children seems to have been altered by their desire to obtain factual information. This alteration may well limit their effectiveness as the child's physician.

Submitted on July 22, 1969
Accepted on December 15, 1969




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Psychother. Pract. Res.Home page
E. R. Marcus
Psychodynamic Social Science and Medical Education
J Psychother Pract Res., July 1, 1999; 8(3): 191 - 194.
[Full Text]

Home page
 BMJHome page
J. D Silverman, J. Draper, and S. M Kurtz
The inhumanity of medicine
BMJ, February 25, 1995; 310(6978): 527a - 527.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
J. G. Carroll and J. Monroe
Teaching Clinical Interviewing in the Health Professions: A Review of Empirical Research
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 1980; 3(1): 21 - 45.
[Abstract]