PEDIATRICS Vol. 44 No. 5 November 1969, pp. 640-646
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, C. P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, C. P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, T. K., Jr.

NURSERY ROUTINES AND STAPHYLOCOCCAL COLONIZATION OF THE NEWBORN

Christopher P. S. Williams M.D.1 and Thomas K. Oliver Jr. M.D.1

1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Staphylococcal colonization was studied in a newborn nursery for 6frac12 years. Culture of the nares of each infant at the time of discharge was found to be a simple, effective monitor. The average rate of 4.1% demonstrates that a low rate can he maintained for an extended period of time. Hexachlorophene bathing of infants and handwashing by personnel between the handling of infants appear to be the critical elements of staphylococcal control. Neither the modification of infant bathing to the extent of deferring the initial bath until the attainment of thermal homeostasis, nor of handwashing to the extent of eliminating brushes resulted in increased colonization. It was also possible to eliminate certain traditional elements of nursery routine-the wearing of caps, masks, hair nets, and gowning except when handling an infant outside an incubator-and to allow medical students and parents fret access to the nurseries, all without an increase in colonization. Elaborate nursery precautions are not only expensive but may also discourage physicians from giving optimal care to ill infants; judicious changes in nursery technique may be made, as long as there is careful surveillance of bacterial colonization and infection.

Submitted on February 26, 1969
Accepted on May 14, 1969




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NeoReviewsHome page
A. G.S. Philip, M. Klaus, and J. H. Kennell
Historical Perspectives: Parents in the Preterm Nursery and Subsequent Evolution of Care
NeoReviews, October 1, 2004; 5(10): e397 - e405.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
F. Serour, A. Gorenstein, and E. Somekh
Needle Aspiration for Suppurative Cervical Lymphadenitis
Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 2002; 41(7): 471 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
C. H. Bauer and W. Tinklepaugh
Low Birth Weight Babies in the Hospital: A Survey of Recent Changes in Their Care, With Special Emphasis on Early Discharge
Clinical Pediatrics, August 1, 1971; 10(8): 467 - 469.
[Abstract] [PDF]