PEDIATRICS Vol. 42 No. 5 November 1968, pp. 803-818
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Margileth, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Margileth, A. M.

CAT SCRATCH DISEASE: NONBACTERIAL REGIONAL LYMPHADENITIS

The Study of 145 Patients and a Review of the Literature

A. M. Margileth M.D.1

1 U.S. Navy

Of 145 patients with nonbacterial lymphadenitis observed over a period of 10 years, 115 had clinical cat scratch disease (CSD) with a positive cat scratch antigen skin test. In this group 86% had a typical benign course of CSD; the remaining 16 (14%) had an atypical form. These unusual forms were: Parinaud's oculoglandular syndrome in 7, encephalopathy in 3, atypical pneumonia in 2, and recurrent suppurative lymphadenopathy in 1. Two typical cases occurred after a dog scratch or bite, and one after a monkey scratch.

The disease was most prevalent in late fall and early winter; 80% of patients were under age 20 years. Primary lesions were detected in 55%, node suppuration occurred in 26%, and lymphadenopathy lasted 2 weeks to 2 months in most patients. Symptoms were absent in 35% of cases. Fever occurred in 26%, and exanthem was present in 4%. Lymphadenopathy was most common in the extremities (57%), and head and neck (43%). Cat scratch antigen was found to be a reliable diagnostic skin test. A negative test was found in 98% of control patients; a positive test was found in 94% of patients who were clinically suspected to have CSD and a history of cat scratch.

Management consisted of reassurance, symptomatic therapy, and closed aspiration of enlarged nodes if suppuration occurred. Antibiotics were not effective. The disease is self-limited and has an excellent prognosis in the majority of patients. An etiologic agent could not be isolated in this study. Until the causative agent is known, it will be difficult to carry out preventive measures.

Submitted on September 14, 1967
Accepted on May 8, 1968




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
Y. Hansmann, S. DeMartino, Y. Piemont, N. Meyer, P. Mariet, R. Heller, D. Christmann, and B. Jaulhac
Diagnosis of Cat Scratch Disease with Detection of Bartonella henselae by PCR: a Study of Patients with Lymph Node Enlargement
J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2005; 43(8): 3800 - 3806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
K. M. Zangwill, D. H. Hamilton, B. A. Perkins, R. L. Regnery, B. D. Plikaytis, J. L. Hadler, M. L. Cartter, and J. D. Wenger
Cat Scratch Disease in Connecticut -- Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Evaluation of a New Diagnostic Test
N. Engl. J. Med., July 1, 1993; 329(1): 8 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
D. Wear, A. Margileth, T. Hadfield, G. Fischer, C. Schlagel, and F. King
Cat scratch disease: a bacterial infection
Science, September 30, 1983; 221(4618): 1403 - 1405.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
P. Miller and W. E. Bell
Cat-Scratch Disease with Encephalopathy
Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 1980; 19(3): 233 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]