PEDIATRICS Vol. 40 No. 1 July 1967, pp. 55-62
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Neel, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adams, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Neel, J. V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CHILDREN OF INCEST

Morton S. Adams M.D.1 and James V. Neel M.D., Ph.D.1

1 Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Eighteen prospectively ascertained cases of brother x sister and father x daughter matings are described. A series of illegitimate children whose mothers were as nearly matched as possible to the incest mothers for intelligence, age, height, weight, and socioeconomic conditions were used as controls. Six of the children of incest had died or were found to have major defects on follow-up 6 months after birth date, whereas one of the comparison children was so classified. This is a larger inbreeding effect than would be predicted on the basis of published findings from marriages of first cousins. The series is published at this time to encourage others to collect these important, but rare and elusive data, in a prospective, controlled manner.

Submitted on October 24, 1966
Accepted on March 8, 1967


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anthropological TheoryHome page
G. C. Leavitt
The incest taboo?: A reconsideration of Westermarck
Anthropological Theory, December 1, 2007; 7(4): 393 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Gender SocietyHome page
N. L. Fischer
Oedipus Wrecked?: The Moral Boundaries of Incest
Gender Society, February 1, 2003; 17(1): 92 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
J. L. HOOGLAND
Prairie Dogs Avoid Extreme Inbreeding
Science, March 26, 1982; 215(4540): 1639 - 1641.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
I. B. WEINER
A Clinical Perspective on Incest
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 1978; 132(2): 123 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. S. ADAMS
Incest: Genetic Considerations
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 1978; 132(2): 124 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Science InformationHome page
N. Bischof
The biological foundations of the incest taboo
Social Science Information, December 1, 1972; 11(6): 7 - 36.