PEDIATRICS Vol. 39 No. 5 May 1967, pp. 794-795
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SISSMAN, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SISSMAN, N. J.

Letters to the Editor

NORMAN J. SISSMAN M.D.1

1 Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Pediatric Cardiac Clinic, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94394

The "controversy" over treatment of infants with ventricular septal defects published in the January 1967 issue of Pediatrics prompts me to comment on one general factor, vital in decisions between alternative methods of treatment of congenital heart disease, which has received little attention in the literature—namely, the experiences and capabilities of individual surgical teams. That Dr. Nadas takes this into account is reflected in his statements, ". . . our surgeons have been able to accomplish [banding of the pulmonary artery] at a mortality rate of 10% or less . . ." and ". . . the pediatrician unless he has surgeons with exceptional ability at his disposal, will do better to . . . proceed conservatively."