PEDIATRICS Vol. 35 No. 5 May 1965, pp. 787-790
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shandling, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shandling, B.

LAPAROTOMY FOR RECTAL BLEEDING

Barry Shandling M.B., Ch.B., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.S.(C).1

1 The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada

THE PROBLEM of the infant or child with rectal bleeding is familiar to all clinicians. The term "rectal bleeding" has through common usage come to mean the passage of blood from the rectum–whether it be bright red or dark, unrelated to, on the surface of, or mixed with the stool. Anal or gastrointestinal bleeding would be a more accurate term, but for the purposes of this paper rectal bleeding will be used in its widest connotation. This study was undertaken to attempt to evaluate the place of surgery in the investigation and treatment of this perplexing condition.

The literature is surprisingly barren of any series of this kind. Several authors of textbooks on pediatric surgery do not even mention the possibility of a fruitless abdominal exploration. Others appear to hazard a guess. However, Nixon and O'Donnell state that probably one-third of patients with rectal bleeding never have the cause diagnosed. White and Dennison give 20% as a likely figure. Gross, in a small review of 65 patients presenting with rectal bleeding as a diagnostic problem, could find no cause for the bleeding in 18, i.e., 27%. Of the 18 patients who were operated upon, only 4 had negative laparotomies. Nevertheless, he states that in an astounding proportion of cases the cause for the rectal bleeding is never found, even after extensive investigation and laparotomy.

Macbeth in a recent paper refers to the difficulties in gathering a series of cases with available methods of coding. Fortunately, at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, case notes are coded in such a way that the histories of patients with rectal bleeding are readily available.

Submitted on April 16, 1964
Accepted on December 7, 1964