1 Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York
INFANT care practices are deeply rooted in culture and represent the end results of generations of experience and conviction. It is understandable that few systematic studies of specific aspects of infant care have been undertaken; for each practice (whether feeding, fondling, toileting, etc.) is characterized by a complex process of interaction and methods of evaluation are difficult to define. Yet with progress in the study of physiologic, psychologic, and socio-cultural processes, it should become possible to study the physiologic and developmental consequences of specific infant care practices.
The objective of this report is to present the results of our efforts to study one infant care practicethat of swaddling. Interest in this practice grew out of our long-term studies of the development of autonomic nervous system function in infancy. These studies of swaddling and early neurophysiologic capacity complement each other in many ways, as will be shown later.
An earlier study of motor restraint by means of swaddling was designed primarily to observe the relationships between autonomic and musculo-skeletal reactivity to stimulation. As the experiment progressed, however, it appeared clear that the process of restraining the infant, per se, often produced a tranquil, "co-operative" state which greatly facilitated the studies of physiologic reactivity.
As it became increasingly apparent that pacification was produced in most newborn infants, we considered with heightened curiosity what implications these findings held for clinical pediatrics and, more broadly, for evaluating the cultural practice of infant bundling or swaddling. We began to wonder whether there was not some more pervasive reason for this previously ubiquitous infant care practice, apart from the common anthropologic interpretations which will be described later in this paper.
Submitted on April 4, 1964
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. E. van Sleuwen, A. C. Engelberts, M. M. Boere-Boonekamp, W. Kuis, T. W.J. Schulpen, and M. P. L'Hoir Swaddling: A Systematic Review Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): e1097 - e1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Franco, N. Seret, J.-N. Van Hees, S. Scaillet, J. Groswasser, and A. Kahn Influence of Swaddling on Sleep and Arousal Characteristics of Healthy Infants Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 115(5): 1307 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Ohgi, T Akiyama, K Arisawa, and K Shigemori Randomised controlled trial of swaddling versus massage in the management of excessive crying in infants with cerebral injuries Arch. Dis. Child., March 1, 2004; 89(3): 212 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Gerard, K. A. Harris, and B. T. Thach Spontaneous Arousals in Supine Infants While Swaddled and Unswaddled During Rapid Eye Movement and Quiet Sleep Pediatrics, December 1, 2002; 110(6): e70 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. J. van Gestel, M. P. L'Hoir, M. ten Berge, N. J. G. Jansen, and F. B. Plotz Risks of Ancient Practices in Modern Times Pediatrics, December 1, 2002; 110(6): e78 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M F van der Wal, D C van den Boom, H Pauw-Plomp, and G A de Jonge Mothers' reports of infant crying and soothing in a multicultural population Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 1998; 79(4): 312 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hewson, F. Oberklaid, and S. Menahem Infant Colic, Distress, and Crying Clinical Pediatrics, February 1, 1987; 26(2): 69 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bloch The Kurdistani Cradle Story: A Modern Analysis of This Centuries-Old Infant Swaddling Practice Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 1966; 5(10): 641 - 645. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.S. Illingworth Sleep Problems of Children Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 1966; 5(1): 45 - 48. [PDF] |
||||