PEDIATRICS Vol. 31 No. 6 June 1963, pp. 969-974
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blackman, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blackman, N. S.

RHEUMATIC FEVER: THE PROBLEM OF DIAGNOSIS BASED ON INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

Norman S. Blackman M.D.1

1 The Cardiac Consultation Service, Bureau for Handicapped Children, Department of Health, New York City, and State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York

In 100 patients referred for consultation with a history of rheumatic fever and/or rheumatic heart disease, only 65 had a history of signs and symptoms sufficient to satisfy the modified Jones' criteria, used for guidance in the diagnosis of rheumatic fever. Moreover in patients without evidence of rheumatic heart disease referred because of a supposed history of rheumatic fever, the diagnosis could not be justified in one of every four children in this study. Many of the important manifestations of rheumatic fever do not require technical knowledge but merely interested and intelligent observation. The parents were found to be the most available and often the best source of information concerning a description of the manifestations of a previous episode of rheumatic fever. It is evident that the modified Jones' criteria are not being sufficiently used by the referring physicians as a guide in making a diagnosis. Clinical over-diagnosis was frequently encountered. Furthermore, there was a marked tendency for subsequent treating physicians to accept, and to perpetuate, a false "history of rheumatic fever" without critical evaluation. Obviously, whenever possible, the history should be justified by eliciting in detail the signs and symptoms observed in the past. Historical data must be obtained and compared with acceptable criteria for diagnosis, for the intelligent management of the patient depends upon such evaluation.

Submitted on August 24, 1962
Accepted on November 7, 1962




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
N. S. Blackman and L. Kuskin
Should Prophylactic Therapy Be Given to Patients with an Uncertain History of Rheumatic Fever?
Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 1972; 11(1): 15 - 19.
[PDF]