PEDIATRICS Vol. 27 No. 5 May 1961, pp. 819-828
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feinstein, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feinstein, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

STANDARDS, STETHOSCOPES, STEROIDS AND STATISTICS

The Problem of Evaluating Treatment in Acute Rheumatic Fever

Alvan R. Feinstein M.D.1

1 Irvington House, Irvington-on-Hudson, New York, and Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine

The different results of recent studies of the treatment of rheumatic fever seem to be due not to therapeutic effects but to the inclusion in compared groups of different percentages of patients with inherently different cardiac prognoses. The homogenization of heterogeneous groups has occurred either through insufficient attention to the details of cardiac classification or through inadverent use of different criteria for the classification. The situation has been aptly described by Hill, who wrote, "the essence of a successful controlled clinical trial lies in its minutiae—in a painstaking, and sometimes very dull, attention to every detail." Until the deficiencies in some of these "minutiae" are remedied, many contentions remain unproved.

Massive penicillin treatment, as compared to none, has not demonstrably reduced heart disease. Since massive treatment was not tested against an ordinary streptococcal-eradicating dose of penicillin, the advantages claimed for massive treatment, even if valid, would not pertain to use of the latter regimen. With regard to anti-inflammatory therapy, steroids have been unequivocally superior to salicylates only in temporarily suppressing the acute, overwhelming carditis of a small percentage of patients who are moribund, but even here, steroids have not affected ultimate cardiac status. Such severely ill patients are uncommon. For most patients with rheumatic carditis, the three most satisfactory trials of steroids versus salicylates have indicated a two-to-one vote against any superiority for steroids. In the minority report, the patient population differed significantly from that of the other two reports, and its different results probably arise from this feature. It still remains to be shown convincingly that steroids, salicylates, or both produce more permanent cardiac benefit in most instances than symptomatic therapy alone.

For the practicing clinician, the preceding discussion is intended as a guide for use in reviewing the evidence and making his choice of treatment. For the investigator who performs therapeutic trials, it is intended to indicate the subtle details which are required for a successful study. For both, it should recall the old admonition of an investigative clinician: "Unless prognosis springs from solid diagnostic roots, the tree is unstable."


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. R. FEINSTEIN
Clinical Epidemiology: III. The Clinical Design of Statistics in Therapy
Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1968; 69(6): 1287 - 1312.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. J. Grossman
Early Ambulation in the Treatment of Acute Rheumatic Fever: A Controlled Study in Children With Acute Rheumatic Fever Treated With Prednisone
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 1968; 115(5): 557 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. R. FEINSTEIN
Scientific Methodology in Clinical Medicine: IV. Acquisition of Clinical Data
Ann Intern Med, December 1, 1964; 61(6): 1162 - 1193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
C. J. SMYTH, R. L. BLACK, C. CHRISTIAN, M. L. CLAYTON, D. F. HILL, J. L. HOLLANDER, W. M. MIKKELSEN, M. M. MONTGOMERY, C. M. PEARSON, H. A. SMYTHE, et al.
Rheumatism and Arthritis: Review of American and English Literature of Recent Years * (Sixteenth Rheumatism Review)
Ann Intern Med, November 1, 1964; 61(5_Part_2): 1 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. R. FEINSTEIN, M. SPAGNUOLO, H. F. WOOD, A. TARANTA, E. TURSKY, and E. KLEINBERG
Rheumatic Fever in Children and Adolescents: A Long-term Epidemiologic Study of Subsequent Prophylaxis, Streptococcal Infections, and Clinical Sequelae * VI. Clinical Features of Streptococcal Infections and Rheumatic Recurrences
Ann Intern Med, February 1, 1964; 60(2_Part_2): 68 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. R. FEINSTEIN, H. F. WOOD, M. SPAGNUOLO, A. TARANTA, S. JONAS, E. KLEINBERG, and E. TURSKY
Rheumatic Fever in Children and Adolescents: A Long-term Epidemiologic Study of Subsequent Prophylaxis, Streptococcal Infections, and Clinical Sequelae * VII. Cardiac Changes and Sequelae
Ann Intern Med, February 1, 1964; 60(2_Part_2): 87 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. R. FEINSTEIN, J. G. ZAGALA, and M. SPAGNUOLO
The Pattern of Symptoms, Pre-Treatment Interval, and Prognosis of Acute Rheumatic Fever
Ann Intern Med, October 1, 1962; 57(4): 563 - 571.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. R. Feinstein, H. Taube, R. Cavalieri, S. C. Schultz, and L. Kryle
Physical Activities and Rheumatic Heart Disease in Asymptomatic Patients
JAMA, June 23, 1962; 180(12): 1028 - 1031.
[Abstract] [PDF]