PEDIATRICS Vol. 14 No. 5 November 1954, pp. 442-448
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NYHAN, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by WESSEL, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NYHAN, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by WESSEL, M. A.

NEONATAL GROWTH IN WEIGHT OF NORMAL INFANTS ON FOUR DIFFERENT FEEDING REGIMENS

WILLIAM L. NYHAN M.D.1 and MORRIS A. WESSEL M.D.1

1 The Yale Rooming-In Project, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

Neonatal weight changes of 400 normal infants were studied statistically. The series was composed of 200 infants fed on a flexible schedule of which 100 were breast-fed and 100 were bottle-fed; and 200 infants fed on the conventional four-hour schedule, of which 100 were breast-fed and 100 were bottle-fed. During the first week of life the ad lib-fed babies had smaller weight losses than the schedule-fed babies and the bottle-fed babies had smaller losses than the breast-fed babies. The duration of weight loss was longer in the breast-fed babies. By the time of the six week postnatal clinic visit, the group that had been breast-fed in the nursery had gained significantly more than the group that had been bottle-fed in the nursery. There were otherwise among the four groups no significant differences in weight gain during this period. It was felt that the observed differences among the four groups parallelled the expected differences in food intake.

Submitted on April 20, 1954