Advertising Disclaimer
Published online January 18, 2010
PEDIATRICS Vol. 125 No. 2 February 2010, pp. e382-e395 (doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1046)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thayyil, S.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, N. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thayyil, S.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, N. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLES

Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Biomarkers in Neonatal Encephalopathy: A Meta-analysis

Sudhin Thayyil, MBBS, MD, DCH, MRCPCHa, Manigandan Chandrasekaran, MBBS, DCHa, Andrew Taylor, MDb, Alan Bainbridge, PhDc, Ernest B. Cady, FInstP, BScc, W. K. Kling Chong, MDd, Shahed Murad, PhDe,f,{dagger}, Rumana Z. Omar, PhDe, Nicola J. Robertson, PhDa

a University College London Institute of Women's Health, London, UK;
b Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, England;
c Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, England;
d Department of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, England;
e Department of Statistical Science, University College London, Biomedical Research Unit, London, England;
f Biostatistics Group, UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Unit, University College London, London, England

OBJECTIVE Accurate prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome in neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is important for clinical management and to evaluate neuroprotective therapies. We undertook a meta-analysis of the prognostic accuracy of cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) biomarkers in infants with neonatal encephalopathy.

METHODS We reviewed all studies that compared an MR biomarker performed during the neonatal period with neurodevelopmental outcome at ≥1 year. We followed standard methods recommended by the Cochrane Diagnostic Accuracy Method group and used a random-effects model for meta-analysis. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves and forest plots of each MR biomarker were calculated. {chi}2 tests examined heterogeneity.

RESULTS Thirty-two studies (860 infants with NE) were included in the meta-analysis. For predicting adverse outcome, conventional MRI during the neonatal period (days 1–30) had a pooled sensitivity of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87%–94%) and specificity of 51% (95% CI: 45%–58%). Late MRI (days 8–30) had higher sensitivity but lower specificity than early MRI (days 1–7). Proton MR spectroscopy deep gray matter lactate/N-acetyl aspartate (Lac/NAA) peak-area ratio (days 1–30) had 82% overall pooled sensitivity (95% CI: 74%–89%) and 95% specificity (95% CI: 88%–99%). On common study analysis, Lac/NAA had better diagnostic accuracy than conventional MRI performed at any time during neonatal period. The discriminatory powers of the posterior limb of internal capsule sign and brain-water apparent diffusion coefficient were poor.

CONCLUSIONS Deep gray matter Lac/NAA is the most accurate quantitative MR biomarker within the neonatal period for prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome after NE. Lac/NAA may be useful in early clinical management decisions and counseling parents and as a surrogate end point in clinical trials that evaluate novel neuroprotective therapies.


Key Words: sensitivity • specificity • meta-analysis • hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy • magnetic resonance imaging • magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Abbreviations: NE = neonatal encephalopathy • MR = magnetic resonance • ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient • MRS = magnetic resonance spectroscopy • LR = likelihood ratio • CI = confidence interval • AUC = area under curve • DOR = diagnostic odds ratio • ESS = effective sample size • Lac/NAA = lactate/N-acetyl aspartate • PLIC = posterior limb of internal capsule


Accepted Aug 7, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
L. S. de Vries and M. J. Jongmans
Long-term outcome after neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2010; 95(3): F220 - F224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]