Published online August 31, 2009
PEDIATRICS Vol. 124 Supplement September 2009, pp. S73-S82 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3586J)

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Google Scholar Articles by Thompson, J. W. Articles by Card-Higginson, P. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thompson, J. W. Articles by Card-Higginson, P. Related Collections Nutrition & Metabolism Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE

Arkansas' Experience: Statewide Surveillance and Parental Information on the Child Obesity Epidemic

Joseph W. Thompson, MD, MPH^a,b,c,d and Paula Card-Higginson, BA, ELS^a,d

^a Arkansas Center for Health Improvement, Little Rock, Arkansas
^b Surgeon General, State of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas
^c Colleges of Medicine and Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
^d Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Center to Prevent Childhood Obesity, Little Rock, Arkansas

Parents, clinicians, public health officials, and policy makers need readily available information on the extent of the childhood obesity epidemic. As in any epidemic, the strategies and tools used to combat the imminent threat are frequently based on scientific rationale and experience but applied in areas in which we lack complete understanding. The urgent need for information requires execution of decisions that are not risk-free—such is the case of BMI screening obesity. Use of BMI percentiles to classify weight status among youth and quantify the epidemic can inform and engage parents and other key stakeholders. Arkansas has completed its sixth year of BMI screenings for public school students. Through a groundbreaking legislative mandate that requires BMI assessments in public schools, the state has achieved both enhanced awareness among parents and their children and increased engagement by school, clinical, public health, and community leaders in response to the epidemic. External evaluations conducted since institution of BMI assessments have revealed none of the initially feared negative consequences of BMI measurements such as teasing, use of diet pills, or excessive concerns about weight. In the face of this epidemic, the risks of using BMI assessments in clinical or school-based settings must be recognized but can be managed. Arkansas' Act 1220 and BMI-reporting efforts have not only afforded parents detailed information about their children's health but also provided longitudinal data needed to fully understand the scope of childhood and adolescent obesity in the state and to track progress made in combating this epidemic.

---

Key Words: obesity • public policy • body mass index • surveillance

Abbreviations: AAP—American Academy of Pediatrics • ICD-9—International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision • CME—continuing medical education • PE—physical education • ACHI—Arkansas Center for Health Improvement • UAMS—University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

---

Accepted Apr 29, 2009.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. H. Dietz, M. T. Story, and L. C. Leviton Issues and Implications of Screening, Surveillance, and Reporting of Children's BMI Pediatrics, September 1, 2009; 124(Supplement_1): S98 - S101. [Full Text] [PDF]