Published online September 28, 2009
PEDIATRICS Vol. 124 No. 4 October 2009, pp. 1135-1142 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3352)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zorc, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zorc, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Asthma
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Beliefs and Barriers to Follow-up After an Emergency Department Asthma Visit: A Randomized Trial

Joseph J. Zorc, MD, MSCEa,c, Amber Chew, BAa,c, Julian L. Allen, MDb,c and Kathy Shaw, MD, MSCEa,c

a Divisions of Emergency Medicine
b Pulmonary Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
c Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

BACKGROUND: Studies in urban emergency departments (EDs) have found poor quality of chronic asthma care and identified beliefs and barriers associated with low rates of follow-up with a primary care provider (PCP).

OBJECTIVES: To develop an ED-based intervention including asthma symptom screening, a video addressing beliefs and a mailed reminder; and measure the effect on PCP follow-up and asthma-related outcomes.

METHODS: This randomized, controlled trial enrolled children aged 1 to 18 years who were discharged after asthma treatment in an urban pediatric ED. Control subjects received instructions to follow-up with a PCP within 3 to 5 days. In addition, intervention subjects (1) received a letter to take to their PCP if they screened positive for persistent asthma symptoms, (2) viewed a video featuring families and providers discussing the importance of asthma control, and (3) received a mailed reminder to follow-up with a PCP. All subjects were contacted by telephone 1, 3, and 6 months after the ED visit, and follow-up was confirmed by PCP record review. Asthma-related quality of life (AQoL), symptoms, and beliefs about asthma care were assessed by using validated surveys.

RESULTS: A total of 433 subjects were randomly assigned, and baseline measures were similar between study groups. After the intervention and before ED discharge, intervention subjects were more likely to endorse beliefs about the benefits of follow-up than controls. However, rates of PCP follow-up during the month after the ED visit (44.5%) were similar to control subjects (43.8%) as were AQoL, medication use, and ED visits.

CONCLUSIONS: An ED-based intervention influenced beliefs but did not increase PCP follow-up or asthma-related outcomes.

Key Words: asthma • emergency • primary care • children

Abbreviations: ED—emergency department • NAEPP—National Asthma Education and Prevention Program • PCP—primary care provider • AQoL—asthma-related quality of life

Accepted May 29, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. E. Mansour
How Do We Support Follow-up With the Primary Care Provider After an Emergency Department Visit for Asthma?
Pediatrics, October 1, 2009; 124(4): 1206 - 1207.
[Full Text] [PDF]