Published online August 10, 2009
PEDIATRICS Vol. 124 No. 3 September 2009, pp. 935-940 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2737)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kadmon, G.
Right arrow Articles by Shonfeld, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kadmon, G.
Right arrow Articles by Shonfeld, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Computerized Order Entry With Limited Decision Support to Prevent Prescription Errors in a PICU

Gili Kadmon, MDa, Efrat Bron-Harlev, MDa, Elhanan Nahum, MDa, Ofer Schiller, MDa, Gali Haski, BAb and Tommy Shonfeld, MDa

a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
b Pharmacy Department, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel

OBJECTIVE: The value of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) in preventing prescription errors in pediatrics is unclear. We investigated the change in prescription error rates with the introduction of CPOE with and without a CDSS limited to weight-based dosing in a PICU.

METHODS: In a PICU of a major tertiary-care pediatric medical center, 5000 orders were reviewed, that is, 1250 orders from each of 4 periods: period 1, before CPOE implementation; period 2, 1 year after CPOE implementation; period 3, after CDSS implementation; and period 4, after a change in prescription authorization. Prescription errors were identified and classified into: potential adverse drug events (ADEs), medication prescription errors (MPEs), and rule violations (RVs).

RESULTS: We identified 273 errors (5.5%). The rate of potential ADEs decreased slightly between periods 1 and 2 (from 2.5% to 2.4%) and significantly in periods 3 and 4 (to 0.8% and 0.7%, respectively; P < .005). The rate of MPEs decreased slightly between periods 1 and 2 (from 5.5% to 5.3%), but new types of MPEs appeared. There was a significant decrease in period 3 (to 3.8%; P < .05) and a dramatically significant decrease in period 4 (to 0.7%; P < .0005). Only 3 RVs were found. Interrater agreement ({kappa} statistic) was 0.788 between evaluators.

CONCLUSIONS: CPOE implementation decreased prescription errors only to a small extent. However, the addition of a CDSS that limits doses by weight significantly reduced prescription error rates and, most importantly, potential ADEs. This finding emphasizes the major impact of weight-based calculation errors in pediatrics.


Key Words: medication error • patient safety • computer physician order entry • clinical decision support • pediatrics • adverse drug events

Abbreviations: ADE—adverse drug event • MPE—medication prescription error • RV—rule violation • CPOE—computerized physician order entry • CDSS—clinical decision support system • CI—confidence interval


Accepted Feb 20, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?