Published online August 3, 2009
PEDIATRICS Vol. 124 No. 3 September 2009, pp. 888-894 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2427)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persaud, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Christopher, N. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Persaud, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Christopher, N. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Genitourinary Tract
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Pediatric Urolithiasis: Clinical Predictors in the Emergency Department

Andre C. Persaud, MDa, Michelle D. Stevenson, MD, MSb, Daniel R. McMahon, MDc,d and Norman C. Christopher, MDa,e,f

a Departments of Pediatric Emergency Medicine
c Pediatric Urology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
b Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky; and Departments of
d Urology
e Emergency Medicine
f Pediatrics, Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rootstown, Ohio

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify factors that predict the presence of urolithiasis detected with unenhanced computed tomography (UCT) in children.

METHODS: A retrospective study of all subjects <21 years of age who presented to the emergency department at Akron Children's Hospital and underwent UCT of the abdomen between January 2002 and December 2005 was performed. Demographic, clinical, diagnostic, treatment, and disposition data were abstracted by using a standardized form. Univariate and logistic regression analyses of factors associated with urolithiasis were performed.

RESULTS: A total of 339 eligible patients were identified, with 110 cases of urolithiasis detected with UCT for 95 individual patients. The mean age of the study patients was 14.4 years; 72 patients (66%) were female. In 17 cases (15%) of urolithiasis, initial urinalysis results were negative for blood. Fifty-seven stones (51.8%) were ureteral, 26 (23.6%) were renal, and 4 (3.6%) were in the bladder. Among children who did not have a stone identified through UCT, 23 cases (10%) of potentially significant, alternative diagnoses were identified. A history of urolithiasis, a history of nausea and vomiting, the presence of flank pain on examination, and >2 red blood cells per high-power field in urine microscopy were positively associated with urolithiasis. A history of fever or dysuria and costovertebral angle tenderness on physical examination were inversely associated with urolithiasis on UCT scans.

CONCLUSIONS: UCT plays an important role in the diagnostic evaluation of children with flank pain. Approximately 15% of children with urolithiasis do not have hematuria.

Key Words: urology • nephrocalcinosis • emergency medicine • computed tomography

Abbreviations: ED—emergency department • UCT—unenhanced computed tomography • RBC—red blood cell • HPF—high-power field • CT—computed tomography • OR—odds ratio • CI—confidence interval

Accepted Mar 24, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?