Published online December 16, 2008
PEDIATRICS Vol. 123 Supplement January 2009, pp. S44-S49 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-1578K)

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Freed, G. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Freed, G. L. Related Collections Office Practice Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE

Recently Trained Pediatric Subspecialists: Perspectives on Training and Scope of Practice

Gary L. Freed, MD, MPH^a,b, Kelly M. Dunham, MPP^a,b, Kara E. Switalski, MPH^a,b, M. Douglas Jones, Jr, MD^c, Gail A. McGuinness, MD^d and the Research Advisory Committee of the American Board of Pediatrics

^a Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Ann Arbor, Michigan
^b Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
^c Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
^d Executive Vice-president, American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

OBJECTIVES. Little is known regarding the factors influencing the decision to pursue pediatric subspecialty fellowship training and the timing of when such a decision is made. In addition, there is no information regarding whether the general pediatrics training received in residency is perceived as valuable by subspecialists. This study was conducted to characterize the strengths and weaknesses of residency and fellowship training from the perspective of recently trained pediatric subspecialists and to assess their current and future career goals and intended scope of practice.

METHODS. A random sample of 550 subspecialists whose initial application for pediatric subspecialty certification occurred between 2002 and 2003 (4–5 years out of training) and 550 subspecialists who applied for board certification between 2005 and 2006 (1–2 years out of training) received a structured questionnaire by mail. The survey focused on decision-making in selection of residency and fellowship programs, strength of residency training in preparation for clinical care provision, and scope of current practice.

RESULTS. The overall response rate was 77%. More than half (54%) of the recently trained subspecialists would have shortened either their pediatric residency or fellowship training if given the opportunity, and 7% were unsure. More than one third of the respondents made the decision to pursue subspecialty training before the start of residency (36% [n = 198]), whereas approximately half of them made this decision during the first (19% [n = 106]) or second (27% [n = 150]) year of residency.

CONCLUSIONS. Many subspecialists would have been interested in modifications to their pediatric residency and fellowship training programs, which may reflect changing patterns of professional activities or the preferences of a younger generation of subspecialists. Given that a substantial proportion of subspecialists decide to pursue subspecialty training before or early in residency, greater flexibility in configuring some residency experiences to meet their career goals would be feasible.

---

Key Words: subspecialists • training • residency • career choice

Abbreviations: ABP—American Board of Pediatrics

---

Accepted Sep 22, 2008.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C. Andreae, K. Dunham, and G. L. Freed Inadequate Training in Billing and Coding as Perceived by Recent Pediatric Graduates Clinical Pediatrics, November 1, 2009; 48(9): 939 - 944. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. Jones Jr, G. A. McGuinness, L. R. First, L. K. Leslie, and and the Residency Review and Redesign in Pediatric Linking Process to Outcome: Are We Training Pediatricians to Meet Evolving Health Care Needs? Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_1): S1 - S7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Freed, K. M. Dunham, M. D. Jones Jr, G. A. McGuinness, L. Althouse, and and the Research Advisory Committee of the America General Pediatrics Resident Perspectives on Training Decisions and Career Choice Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_1): S26 - S30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Freed, K. M. Dunham, K. E. Switalski, M. D. Jones Jr, G. A. McGuinness, and and the Research Advisory Committee of the America Pediatric Fellows: Perspectives on Training and Future Scope of Practice Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_1): S31 - S37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. K. Leslie What Can Data Tell Us About the Quality and Relevance of Current Pediatric Residency Education? Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_1): S50 - S55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]