Published online May 26, 2009
PEDIATRICS Vol. 123 No. 6 June 2009, pp. e1045-e1051 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-1968)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by So, T.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Absher, R. K.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by So, T.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Absher, R. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Different Methods Used to Estimate Weights in the Pediatric Population

Tsz-Yin So, PharmD, BCPSa, Elizabeth Farrington, PharmD, FCCP, FCCM, BCPSa and Randall K. Absher, PharmD, BCPSb

a Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Children's Hospital, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
b Department of Pharmacy, Moses Cone Health System, Greensboro, North Carolina

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive accuracy of 3 methods (Broselow tape, Leffler formula, and Theron formula) for pediatric weight estimation to identify factors that can influence weight estimation, and to derive alternative models for such estimation if indicated.

METHODS. This was a prospective, nonblinded observational study. Every patient in the cohort was ≤10 years of age. The patients’ age and height were used to estimate their weight by using the 3 previously mentioned methods. These estimated weights were compared with the patients’ actual weight by using the modified Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS. One thousand eleven subjects were included. Percent differences between predicted and actual weight were significantly less using the Broselow tape compared with other methods for patients weighing <10 or 10 to 25 kg and for the Theron formula compared with other methods for patients weighing >40 kg. For patients weighing 25.1 to 40 kg, performance of the Broselow tape and Leffler method were similar, and both were superior to the Theron formula. Three weight predictors (age, gender, and ethnicity) were identified, and 2 new weight-estimation models were derived from the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS. The Broselow tape is accurate for weight estimation in children ≤25 kg, but the Theron formula performs better with patients weighing >40 kg. The Broselow tape was not statistically superior to the Leffler formula in subjects weighing 25.1 to 40 kg. A separate cohort is needed to evaluate the validity of the alternative predictive formulae.

Key Words: pediatrics • body weight • estimation • Broselow • Theron • Leffler

Abbreviations: UNC—University of North Carolina

Accepted Feb 12, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?