Published online January 26, 2009
PEDIATRICS Vol. 123 No. 2 February 2009, pp. 669-673 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-1117)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhandari, V.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhandari, V.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart & Blood Vessels
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Yersinia enterocolitica and...
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Genetic Contribution to Patent Ductus Arteriosus in the Premature Newborn

Vineet Bhandari, MD, DMa, Gongfu Zhou, PhDb, Matthew J. Bizzarro, MDa, Catalin Buhimschi, MDc, Naveed Hussain, MDd, Jeffrey R. Gruen, MDa,e,f,g and Heping Zhang, PhDb

Departments of a Pediatrics
b Epidemiology and Public Health
c Obstetrics and Gynecology
e Genetics
f Investigative Medicine
g Yale Child Health Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
d Division of Neonatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut

BACKGROUND. The most common congenital heart disease in the newborn population, patent ductus arteriosus, accounts for significant morbidity in preterm newborns. In addition to prematurity and environmental factors, we hypothesized that genetic factors play a significant role in this condition.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to quantify the contribution of genetic factors to the variance in liability for patent ductus arteriosus in premature newborns.

PATIENTS AND METHODS. A retrospective study (1991–2006) from 2 centers was performed by using zygosity data from premature twins born at ≤36 weeks' gestational age and surviving beyond 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. Patent ductus arteriosus was diagnosed by echocardiography at each center. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the effect of specific covariates. Latent variable probit modeling was then performed to estimate the heritability of patent ductus arteriosus, and mixed-effects probit modeling was used to quantify the genetic component.

RESULTS. We obtained data from 333 dizygotic twin pairs and 99 monozygotic twin pairs from 2 centers (Yale University and University of Connecticut). Data on chorioamnionitis, antenatal steroids, gestational age, body weight, gender, respiratory distress syndrome, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, oxygen supplementation, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were comparable between monozygotic and dizygotic twins. We found that gestational age, respiratory distress syndrome, and institution were significant covariates for patent ductus arteriosus. After controlling for specific covariates, genetic factors or the shared environment accounted for 76.1% of the variance in liability for patent ductus arteriosus.

CONCLUSIONS. Preterm patent ductus arteriosus is highly familial (contributed to by genetic and environmental factors), with the effect being mainly environmental, after controlling for known confounders.


Key Words: neonate • patent ductus arteriosus • twins • genetic

Abbreviations: PDA—patent ductus arteriosus • RDS—respiratory distress syndrome • NEC—necrotizing enterocolitis • BPD—bronchopulmonary dysplasia • MELR—mixed-effects logistic regression • GA—gestational age • BW—birth weight • INST—treating institution • OR—odds ratio • CI—confidence interval


Accepted Jun 4, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?