Published online January 26, 2009
PEDIATRICS Vol. 123 No. 2 February 2009, pp. 451-457 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0911)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcken, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcken, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Economic Evaluation of Tandem Mass Spectrometry Newborn Screening in Australia

Richard Norman, MSca, Marion Haas, PhDa, Meredyth Chaplin, BAppSca, Pamela Joy, PhDb and Bridget Wilcken, MB, ChBb,c

a Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
b Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
c Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

OBJECTIVE. The goal was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of tandem mass spectrometry screening for the detection of inborn metabolic errors in an Australian setting.

METHODS. Cost-effectiveness analysis from the health service perspective was undertaken on the basis of registry data for affected individuals. The intervention group was contrasted with both a contemporaneous group in nonscreening states and a historical cohort. The registry covers all individuals identified in Australia between 1994 and 2002. Main outcome measures were the total net cost of screening, the cost of treatment, life-years saved, and deaths averted.

RESULTS. The total net cost of testing was estimated to be A$218 000 per 100 000 infants. Medical costs incurred by the intervention group exceeded those for the control group by A$131 000 per 100 000 infants. The number of life-years saved per 100 000 infants screened was 32.378 life-years per 100 000 infants through an expected mortality rate reduction of 0.738 deaths per 100 000 infants. The cost per death averted was estimated to be A$472 913 and the cost per life-year saved was estimated to be A$10 779, which compare favorably with existing cost-effectiveness standards. This conclusion is particularly robust because conservative assumptions were made throughout, because of data limitations. Sensitivity analyses suggested that this result was relatively robust to adjustment of model parameters.

CONCLUSIONS. Tandem mass spectrometry screening for conditions caused by rare errors of metabolism is likely to be a cost-effective intervention in Australia.

Key Words: newborn • screening • metabolism • cost-effectiveness • Australia

Abbreviations: MS/MS—tandem mass spectrometry • NSW—New South Wales • SA—South Australia

Accepted May 12, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
B. Wilcken, M. Haas, P. Joy, V. Wiley, F. Bowling, K. Carpenter, J. Christodoulou, D. Cowley, C. Ellaway, J. Fletcher, et al.
Expanded Newborn Screening: Outcome in Screened and Unscreened Patients at Age 6 Years
Pediatrics, August 1, 2009; 124(2): e241 - e248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]