Published online October 31, 2008
PEDIATRICS Vol. 122 Supplement November 2008, pp. S179-S180 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2139M)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ALLERGY


Infections in Child Day Care Centers and Later Development of Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis, and Atopic Dermatitis Infections in Child Day Care Centers: Prospective Follow-up Survey 12 Years After Controlled Randomized Hygiene Intervention

Jennifer S. Kim, MD

Chicago, IL

ABSTRACT

Dunder T, Tapiainen T, Pokka T, Uhari M. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(10):972–977

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY. To evaluate the effect of prevention of common infections in child day care centers (CDCCs) on the later development of allergic disease.

STUDY POPULATION. Children <2 years of age were recruited from 20 CDCCs in Finland for a 15-month randomized, controlled hygiene intervention trial conducted in 1991–1992. Among the children in the intervention CDCCs, there were 27% fewer episodes of acute otitis media and 24% fewer days of antimicrobial agents.

METHODS. Questionnaires were sent in 2003 (12 years later) to 1376 participants of the previous intervention trial; 928 participated (response rate: 68%). The main outcome measures were the number of respondents with a physician diagnosis of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and/or atopic dermatitis (AD) and those who reported symptoms of atopic disease.

RESULTS. No differences were found between the intervention and control groups with regard to rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, or AD or with frequency of atopic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS. The prevention of common respiratory tract and enteric infections during early childhood does not change later allergic morbidity.

REVIEWER COMMENTS. This particular hygiene intervention, aimed at decreasing the frequency of common childhood upper respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses, was not successful in decreasing the development of asthma, allergic rhinitis, or AD among this cohort. The authors argued that the magnitude of the reduction in infections and duration of the intervention should have led to an increase in asthma rates as proposed by the hygiene hypothesis. However, the infection history was based on clinical symptoms and use of antibiotics rather than more definitive laboratory diagnostic measures for specific bacteria and/or viruses. In addition, the follow-up data were based solely on questionnaire findings, which have an inherent reporting bias. Regardless, additional studies are necessary to characterize the role of the hygiene hypothesis in the development of atopic disease.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?