Published online December 1, 2008
PEDIATRICS Vol. 122 No. 6 December 2008, pp. e1141-e1148 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2007-3587)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverstein, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silverstein, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, D. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

"You Get What You Get": Unexpected Findings About Low-Income Parents' Negative Experiences With Community Resources

Michael Silverstein, MD, MPHa, Jacqueline Lamberto, MPHb, Kristina DePeau, MPHb and David C. Grossman, MD, MPHc

a Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
b Maternal Child Health Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
c Group Health Cooperative, Boston, Massachusetts

CONTEXT. Community-based resources are considered a critical part of the American health care system. However, studies evaluating the effectiveness of such resources have not been accompanied by rigorous explorations of the perceptions or experiences of those who use them.

OBJECTIVES. We aimed to understand and classify types of negative perceptions that low-income parents have of community resources. This objective originated from a series of unexpected findings that emerged during the analysis of qualitative data that were initially collected for other purposes.

METHODS. We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with urban low-income parents. Themes emerged through a grounded theory analysis of coded interview transcripts. Interviews took place in 2 different cities as part of 2 studies with distinct objectives.

RESULTS. We completed 41 interviews. Informants often perceived their interactions with people and organizations as a series of trade-offs, and often perceived important choices as decisions between 2 suboptimal options. Seeking help from community resources was seen in that context. The following specific themes emerged: (1) engaging with services sometimes meant subjecting oneself to requirements perceived as unnecessary and, in the extreme, having to adopt the value systems of others; (2) accepting services was sometimes perceived as a loss of control over one's surroundings, which, in turn, was associated with feelings of sadness, helplessness, or stress; (3) individuals staffing community agencies were sometimes seen as judgmental or intrusive, and when many services were accessed concurrently, information sometimes became overbearing or a source of additional stress; and (4) some services or advice received as part of such services were perceived as unhelpful because they were too generic or formulaic.

CONCLUSIONS. Our data suggest that definable patterns of negative perceptions of community resources may exist among low-income parents. Quantifying these perceptions may help improve the client-centeredness of such organizations and may ultimately help reduce barriers to engagement.

Key Words: community resources • access to care • qualitative interviews • qualitative research • vulnerable populations

Accepted Aug 22, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?