Published online September 15, 2008
PEDIATRICS Vol. 122 No. 4 October 2008, pp. e911-e916 (doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0257)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venkateswaran, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shevell, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Venkateswaran, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shevell, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Developmental/Behavior
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

The Case Against Routine Electroencephalography in Specific Language Impairment

Sunita Venkateswaran, MD, FRCPCa and Michael Shevell, MDCM, FRCP(C)b

a Departments of Neurology/Neurosurgery
b Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal Children's Hospital-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

BACKGROUND. Specific language impairment is a primary developmental language disorder in which language is impaired disproportionately to other developmental domains. Electroencephalography is often conducted in the medical investigation of a child with specific language impairment; however, at present, there is uncertainty regarding necessary testing using electroencephalography.

METHODS. The cases of 111 children with the diagnosis of specific language impairment over a 10-year interval, who also underwent electroencephalography, were systematically reviewed in a retrospective manner. Children with a history of previous afebrile seizures, acquired language delay, or documented language regression, developmental delay, hearing loss, coexisting autistic features, and known central nervous system disorders were excluded.

RESULTS. The majority (76%) of the children were boys. Thirty-five (31.5%) children had abnormal electroencephalography results, including 7 (6.3%) children with epileptiform activity. This is higher than the prevalence rate of epileptiform activity in a historical cohort of 3726 (3.54%) children but not statistically significant. The epileptiform activity was deemed active in only 3 of 7 patients and was not related to the specific type of language delay observed.

CONCLUSIONS. Although abnormal electroencephalographic activity is seen frequently in children with specific language impairment, epileptiform activity is rare and without apparent impact on clinical care. Awake electroencephalography does not seem to be useful in the routine diagnostic evaluation of young children with specific language impairment, although further investigations of both wake and sleep electroencephalography in this homogenous population must be conducted before definitive recommendations can be made.

Key Words: specific language impairment • EEG • pediatric • language delay

Abbreviations: SLI—specific language impairment • ADHD—attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder • EEG—electroencephalography • PA—paroxysmal activity

Accepted Jun 4, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?