Published online October 1, 2008
PEDIATRICS Vol. 122 No. 4 October 2008, pp. 752-759 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2007-1979)

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brierley, J. Articles by Peters, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brierley, J. Articles by Peters, M. J. Related Collections Infectious Disease & Immunity Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

ARTICLE

Distinct Hemodynamic Patterns of Septic Shock at Presentation to Pediatric Intensive Care

Joe Brierley, MA^a,b and Mark J. Peters, PhD^a,b

^a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, England
^b Critical Care Group, Portex Unit, Institute of Child Health, London, England

OBJECTIVE. Early aggressive resuscitation is accepted best practice for severe pediatric sepsis. Targeting of therapy to individual hemodynamic patterns is recommended, but assessment of patterns is difficult early in the disease process. New technologies enabling earlier hemodynamic assessment in shock may inform choices for vasoactive drugs in fluid-resistant cases.

METHODS. This was a prospective observational study of 30 children with suspected fluid-resistant septic shock (minimum: 40 mL/kg) admitted to the PICU of a tertiary care children's hospital between July 2004 and July 2005. Children were classified according to admission diagnosis (community-acquired sepsis or central venous catheter-associated infection) and assessed within 4 hours after the onset of shock with a noninvasive cardiac output device. Cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance index were measured for all patients. Central venous oxygen saturation was measured for patients with accessible central venous lines at the time of hemodynamic measurements (typically at the superior vena cava-right atrium junction).

RESULTS. Fluid-resistant septic shock secondary to central venous catheter-associated infection was typically "warm shock" (15 of 16 patients; 94%), with high cardiac index and low systemic vascular resistance index. In contrast, this pattern was rarely seen in community-acquired sepsis (2 of 14 patients; 14%), where a normal or low cardiac index was predominant.

CONCLUSIONS. The hemodynamic patterns of fluid-resistant septic shock by the time children present to the PICU are distinct, depending on cause, with little overlap. If these findings can be reproduced, then targeting the choice of first-line vasoactive infusions in fluid-resistant shock (vasopressors for central venous catheter-associated infections and inotropes for community-acquired sepsis) should be considered.

---

Key Words: septic shock • PICU • hemodynamic • central venous catheter-associated infection

Abbreviations: CA—community-acquired • CVC—central venous catheter • CO—cardiac output • SVRI—systemic vascular resistance index • USCOM—ultrasound cardiac output monitor

---

Accepted Dec 20, 2007.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Bratton Patterns of Septic Shock in Children: Warm versus Cold Shock AAP Grand Rounds, February 1, 2009; 21(2): 16 - 16. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

żCA vs CVC? Involvements.

Guillermo Luis Montalván González

Pediatrics Online, 6 Oct 2008 [Full text]