Published online October 1, 2008
PEDIATRICS Vol. 122 No. 4 October 2008, pp. 731-735 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2007-3278)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guillet, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kwon, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guillet, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kwon, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Therapeutics & Toxicology
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Prophylactic Phenobarbital Administration After Resolution of Neonatal Seizures: Survey of Current Practice

Ronnie Guillet, MD, PhDa and Jennifer M. Kwon, MD, MPHb

a Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology
b Department of Neurology, Division of Child Neurology, Golisano Children's Hospital at Strong, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York

OBJECTIVE. Child neurologists and neonatologists often discharge newborn infants with phenobarbital treatment for weeks to months despite the absence of continuing seizure activity. We conducted a national survey to determine the degree of variation in this practice.

METHODS. Surveys were sent to a randomly generated list of board-certified child neurologists (N = 609) and neonatologists (N = 579). The survey consisted of 3 parts, that is, questions related to overall attitudes and practices, specific patient scenarios, and respondent demographic characteristics. Responses were tabulated and analyzed for all respondents combined and for child neurologists and neonatologists separately. Variation in practices between respondents and the consistency between the respondents' stated use of phenobarbital in practice and their answers to various clinical scenarios were evaluated.

RESULTS. Responses were received from 118 child neurologists (20.7%) and 125 neonatologists (23.1%). There was wide variation in practices, with little difference in the response frequencies between child neurologists and neonatologists. Physicians were more likely to respond yes to continuation of phenobarbital treatment in a given clinical situation than would be predicted on the basis of their answers regarding overall frequency of use.

CONCLUSIONS. Since the survey of practices 15 years ago, child neurologists and neonatologists are reporting less frequent and shorter phenobarbital treatment after resolution of neonatal seizures, although there remains considerable variation in practices. Moreover, what physicians report as their practice in general is inconsistent with how they respond to specific clinical cases of neonatal seizures.

Key Words: neonatal seizures • phenobarbital • survey

Accepted Jan 9, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?