PEDIATRICS Vol. 121 Supplement February 2008, pp. S172-S191 (doi:10.1542/peds.2007-1813D)
SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE |
Examination of US Puberty-Timing Data from 1940 to 1994 for Secular Trends: Panel Findings
a National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
b Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
c Department of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
d University Department of Growth and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej, Copenhagen, Denmark
e Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Institute of Preventive Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
f Division of Endocrinology DIabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Biomedicum, University of Helsinki
g Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
h Department of Family & Communty Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Whether children, especially girls, are entering and progressing through puberty earlier today than in the mid-1900s has been debated. Secular trend analysis, based on available data, is limited by data comparability among studies in different populations, in different periods of time, and using different methods. As a result, conclusions from data comparisons have not been consistent. An expert panel was asked to evaluate the weight of evidence for whether the data, collected from 1940 to 1994, are sufficient to suggest or establish a secular trend in the timing of puberty markers in US boys or girls. A majority of the panelists agreed that data are sufficient to suggest a trend toward an earlier breast development onset and menarche in girls but not for other female pubertal markers. A minority of panelists concluded that the current data on girls' puberty timing for any marker are insufficient. Almost all panelists concluded, on the basis of few studies and reliability issues of some male puberty markers, that current data for boys are insufficient to evaluate secular trends in male pubertal development. The panel agreed that altered puberty timing should be considered an adverse effect, although the magnitude of change considered adverse was not assessed. The panel recommended (1) additional analyses of existing puberty-timing data to examine secular trends and trends in the temporal sequence of pubertal events; (2) the development of biomarkers for pubertal timing and methods to discriminate fat versus breast tissue, and (3) establishment of cohorts to examine pubertal markers longitudinally within the same individuals.
Key Words: puberty secular trends puberty menarche Tanner stage precocious puberty growth and development
Abbreviations: Bn—breast development Tanner stage n PHn—pubic hair development Tanner stage n PROS—Pediatric Research in Office Settings NHANES—National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey HPA—hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal Gn—genital development Tanner stage n HPG—hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal SES—socioeconomic status NHES—National Health Examination Survey HHANES—Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Accepted Sep 5, 2007.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Karaolis-Danckert, A. E Buyken, A. Sonntag, and A. Kroke Birth and early life influences on the timing of puberty onset: results from the DONALD (DOrtmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed) Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2009; 90(6): 1559 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Cromer and C. M. Gordon Early Pubertal Development in Chinese Girls Pediatrics, August 1, 2009; 124(2): 799 - 801. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-M. Ma, M.-L. Du, X.-P. Luo, S.-K. Chen, L. Liu, R.-M. Chen, C. Zhu, F. Xiong, T. Li, W. Wang, et al. Onset of Breast and Pubic Hair Development and Menses in Urban Chinese Girls Pediatrics, August 1, 2009; 124(2): e269 - e277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Terry, J. S. Ferris, P. Tehranifar, Y. Wei, and J. D. Flom Birth Weight, Postnatal Growth, and Age at Menarche Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2009; 170(1): 72 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Aksglaede, K. Sorensen, J. H. Petersen, N. E. Skakkebaek, and A. Juul Recent Decline in Age at Breast Development: The Copenhagen Puberty Study Pediatrics, May 1, 2009; 123(5): e932 - e939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cheng, N. Karaolis-Danckert, L. Libuda, K. Bolzenius, T. Remer, and A. E. Buyken Relation of Dietary Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Fiber and Whole-Grain Intakes During Puberty to the Concurrent Development of Percent Body Fat and Body Mass Index Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2009; 169(6): 667 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E Buyken, N. Karaolis-Danckert, and T. Remer Association of prepubertal body composition in healthy girls and boys with the timing of early and late pubertal markers Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 221 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Golub, G. W. Collman, P. M.D. Foster, C. A. Kimmel, E. Rajpert-De Meyts, E. O. Reiter, R. M. Sharpe, N. E. Skakkebaek, and J. Toppari Public Health Implications of Altered Puberty Timing Pediatrics, February 1, 2008; 121(Supplement_3): S218 - S230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







