Published online January 2, 2008
PEDIATRICS Vol. 121 Supplement January 2008, pp. S96 (doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2022R)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stabouli, S.
Right arrow Articles by Constantopoulos, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stabouli, S.
Right arrow Articles by Constantopoulos, A.

ALLERGOLOGY


LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS INDEX IN HYPERTENSIVE CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

Stella Staboulia, Vasilios Kotsisb, Christine Karagiannia, Savvas Toumanidisc, Nikos Zakopoulosc and Andreas Constantopoulosa

a Second Department of Pediatrics, National and Kapodestrial University, Athens, Greece
b Hypertension Center, Third Department of Medicine, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
c Hypertension Center, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodestrial University, Athens, Greece

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate differences in left-ventricular mass corrected for height2.7 (LVMI) in children and adolescents according to 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) levels.

METHODS: A total of 67 consecutive children and adolescents aged 5 to 20 years were analyzed. Patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring and echocardiography. LVMI was calculated by using the Devereux equation. All subjects underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on a usual school day. Ambulatory hypertension was defined as mean daytime systolic BP and/or diastolic BP at ≥95th percentile for gender and height (n = 22). Prehypertension was defined as mean daytime systolic BP and/or diastolic BP at ≥90th percentile and <95th percentile for gender and height (n = 13). Normotension was defined as mean daytime systolic BP and/or diastolic BP at <90th percentile for gender and height (n = 32).

RESULTS: LVMI was 28.3 ± 9.4 g/m2.7 (mean ± SD) in the normotensive subjects (n = 32), whereas it was 35.1 ± 8.7 g/m2.7 in the hypertensive subjects (n = 22), a difference that was significantly higher (P < .001, Mann-Whitney test). LVMI was 32.4 ± 5.4 g/m2.7 in prehypertensive subjects (n = 13), values that tended to be lower than the values of hypertensive subjects (P = .275) and significantly higher than the values of normotensive subjects (P < .05, Mann-Whitney test).

CONCLUSIONS: Children and adolescents characterized as hypertensive or prehypertensive using the ambulatory blood pressure criteria exhibited significantly higher LVMI than normotensive subjects. Prehypertensive children may be at a similar risk for cardiovascular target-organ damage as that established for hypertensive children.

Submitted by Stella Stabouli