Published online January 2, 2008
PEDIATRICS Vol. 121 Supplement January 2008, pp. S102 (doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2022FF)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Touliatou, V.
Right arrow Articles by Kanavakis, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Touliatou, V.
Right arrow Articles by Kanavakis, E.

DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS



MULTIDISCIPLINARY MEDICAL EVALUATION OF CHILDREN YOUNGER THAN 7.5 YEARS BORN AFTER PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS FOR MONOGENIC DISEASES

Vassiliki Touliatoua, Loretta Thomaidisb, Stelios Madoudisb, Hera Drandakisb, Sophia Kitsioua, Joanne Traeger-Synodinosa, Christina Vrettoua, Maria Tzetisa and Emmanuel Kanavakisa

a Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Agia Sophia Children's Hospital
b Developmental Assessment Unit, First Department of Pediatrics, Athens University, Athens, Greece

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The growing cohort of children conceived after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) techniques underlines the importance of evaluating potential risks for their developmental outcome. There are some data concerning the incidence of congenital anomalies, medical status, and cognitive development of children conceived after PGD techniques, based mainly on reports and not on objective medical evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform multidisciplinary evaluation (physical, genetic, and developmental) of 31 children conceived after PGD techniques (aged 30 days to 7.5 years) and the stress level of parents who used PGD regarding their parental role.

METHODS: Among 24 couples at risk for transmitting monogenic diseases and with an unsuccessful reproductive history, 31 children conceived after PGD techniques were examined. Genetic examination was performed by 2 independent geneticists, and developmental assessment included formal testing of cognitive and motor skills (Bayley scales, Griffiths scales, Athina test). Parental stress was measured by using the Parent Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF), a self-report questionnaire that assesses parental stress. The PSI-SF was also completed by 35 parents of naturally conceived, healthy children matched for age, gender, and socioeconomic level.

RESULTS: A high rate of cesarean deliveries were reported, but no higher risk was found for perinatal complications. The increased incidence of prematurity and low birth weight among children conceived after PGD techniques did not seem to affect their growth development later in life. Major malformations (cardiac, gastrointestinal, urogenital, skeletal) were present in 4 (12.9%) of 31 children, with a discrepancy between singletons and multiples. A significant number of children conceived after PGD techniques (6 of 31 [19%]), mostly multiple, premature, and small-for-gestational-age infants, experienced low levels of cognitive, verbal, and perceptual abilities (Global Development Quotient scores of <85). Parents who used PGD experienced lower levels of parenting stress compared with controls (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Children conceived after PGD techniques seem to be at greater risk for exhibiting congenital malformations and lower cognitive skills. Whether these observations are linked to the PGD procedure itself, rather than to subfertility, multiplicity, or prematurity, is a question that is difficult to answer. An unexpected finding was that once parents who used PGD finally had what they struggled for (a healthy infant), the stresses of parenthood may have been offset by a broader sense of fulfillment.



Submitted by Loretta Thomaidis