Advertising Disclaimer
Published online March 17, 2008
PEDIATRICS Vol. 121 No. 4 April 2008, pp. e754-e758 (doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0251)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Use of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure During Retrieval of Neonates With Acute Respiratory Distress

Philip G. Murray, MRCPCH, Michael J. Stewart, FRACP

Newborn Emergency Transport Service, Royal Women's Hospital, Carlton, Victoria, Australia

OBJECTIVE. Although nasal continuous positive airway pressure is widely used in neonatal units, its use in neonatal transport is not yet established. Previous reports have been limited to small numbers of primary road transports and larger numbers of return transports while its use in air transportation has not been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of transporting neonates and infants by road or air while treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

METHODS. We conducted a retrospective review of the records of all infants transported between January 1, 2004, and November 1, 2005.

RESULTS. A total of 220 infants were treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure; of these, 13 infants (6%) were intubated before transport, leaving 207 infants transported on a median nasal continuous positive airway pressure of 7 cm H2O. Thirty infants were transported by fixed or rotary wing aircraft and 190 by road. No infants required intubation or bag and mask ventilation during transport. Twenty-eight infants (13%) required intubation within 24 hours of arrival at the receiving hospital, 4 infants (2%) were intubated >24 hours after arrival, 11 infants (5%) were intubated for surgery, and 164 infants (73%) were never intubated. A total of 111 infants (50%) were preterm and <72 hours old at transport, and 32 infants (15%) were ≤32 weeks' gestational age and <72 hours old at transport. Fraction of inspired oxygen was significantly lower at the end of transport (0.45 vs 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure is effective and has an acceptable safety margin for the road-based transportation of infants with acute respiratory distress. Air transport is feasible but larger studies are required to assess safety.

Key Words: NCPAP • transport • fixed wing • rotary wing • neonate

Abbreviations: NCPAP—nasal continuous positive airway pressure • NETS—Newborn Emergency Transport Service • TCO2—transcutaneous CO2 • FIO2—fraction of inspired oxygen • RDS—respiratory distress syndrome • GA—gestational age

Accepted Sep 5, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?