Published online February 29, 2008
PEDIATRICS Vol. 121 No. 3 March 2008, pp. e619-e625 (doi:10.1542/peds.2007-1488)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knoop, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bleijenberg, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knoop, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bleijenberg, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adolescent Medicine

ARTICLE

Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Hans Knoop, MSca, Maja Stulemeijer, MSca, Lieke W. A. M. de Jong, MScb, Theo J. W. Fiselier, MD, PhDc and Gijs Bleijenberg, PhDa

a Expert Centre Chronic Fatigue
b Department of Medical Psychology
c Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this work was to assess the long-term outcome of adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome who received cognitive behavioral therapy and to determine the predictive value of fatigue severity and physical impairments of the adolescent and the fatigue severity of the mother at baseline for the outcome of the treatment at follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS. Sixty-six adolescent patients with chronic fatigue syndrome who previously participated in a randomized, controlled trial that showed that cognitive behavioral therapy was more effective than a waiting-list condition in reducing fatigue and improving physical functioning were contacted for a follow-up assessment. Fifty participants of the follow-up study had received cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome (32 formed the cognitive behavioral therapy group in the original trial, and 18 patients received cognitive behavioral therapy after the waiting period). The remaining 16 patients had refused cognitive behavioral therapy after the waiting period. The main outcome measures were fatigue severity (Checklist Individual Strength), physical functioning (Short-Form General Health Survey), and school attendance.

RESULTS. Data were complete for 61 patients at follow-up (cognitive behavioral therapy group: 47 patients; no-treatment group: 14 patients). The mean follow-up time was 2.1 years. There was no significant change in fatigue severity between posttreatment and follow-up in the cognitive behavioral therapy group. There was a significant further increase in physical functioning and school attendance (10% increase). The adolescents in the cognitive behavioral therapy group were significantly less fatigued and significantly less functionally impaired and had higher school attendance at follow-up than those in the no-treatment group. Fatigue severity of the mother was a significant predictor of treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS. The positive effects of cognitive behavioral therapy in adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome are sustained after cognitive behavioral therapy. Higher fatigue severity of the mother predicts lower treatment outcome in adolescent patients.

Key Words: chronic fatigue syndrome • cognitive behavioral therapy • follow-up study

Abbreviations: CFS—chronic fatigue syndrome • CBT—cognitive behavioral therapy • CIS—Checklist Individual Strength • SF-36—Short-Form General Health Survey • df—degrees of freedom • CI—confidence interval

Accepted Aug 16, 2007.