PEDIATRICS Vol. 121 No. 3 March 2008, pp. e539-e546 (doi:10.1542/peds.2007-1786)
ARTICLE |
Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Best-Practice Individualized Behavioral Program for Treatment of Childhood Overweight: Scottish Childhood Overweight Treatment Trial (SCOTT)
a Division of Developmental Medicine, University of Glasgow, Yorkhill Hospitals, Glasgow, United Kingdom
b Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
c Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Yorkhill Hospitals, Glasgow, United Kingdom
d Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
e Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
f University of Liverpool Management School, Liverpool, United Kingdom
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to determine whether a generalizable best-practice individualized behavioral intervention reduced BMI z score relative to standard dietetic care among overweight children.
METHODS. The design consisted of an assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial involving 134 overweight children (59 boys, 75 girls; BMI
98th centile relative to United Kingdom 1990 reference data for children aged 5–11 years) who were randomly assigned to a best-practice behavioral program (intervention) or standard care (control). The intervention used family-centered counseling and behavioral strategies to modify diet, physical activity, and sedentary behavior. BMI z score, weight, objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior, fat distribution, quality of life, and height z score were recorded at baseline and at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS. The intervention had no significant effect relative to standard care on BMI z score from baseline to 6 months and 12 months. BMI z score decreased significantly in both groups from baseline to 6 and 12 months. For those who complied with treatment, there was a significantly smaller weight increase in those in the intervention group compared with control subjects from baseline to 6 months. There were significant between-group differences in favor of the intervention for changes in total physical activity, percentage of time spent in sedentary behavior, and light-intensity physical activity.
CONCLUSIONS. A generalizable, best-practice individualized behavioral intervention had modest benefits on objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior but no significant effect on BMI z score compared with standard care among overweight children. The modest magnitude of the benefits observed perhaps argues for a longer-term and more intense intervention, although such treatments may not be realistic for many health care systems.
Key Words: obesity overweight children treatment BMI physical activity sedentary behavior randomized controlled trial
Abbreviations: RCT—randomized, controlled trial QoL—quality of life IQR—interquartile range df—degrees of freedom CI—confidence interval
Accepted Aug 15, 2007.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Wake, L. A Baur, B. Gerner, K. Gibbons, L. Gold, J. Gunn, P. Levickis, Z. McCallum, G. Naughton, L. Sanci, et al. Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial BMJ, September 3, 2009; 339(sep03_2): b3308 - b3308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






