Published online December 31, 2007
PEDIATRICS Vol. 121 No. 1 January 2008, pp. 157-161 (doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3015)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moreno, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Christakis, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moreno, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Christakis, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

SPECIAL ARTICLE

Research Ethics in the MySpace Era

Megan A. Moreno, MD, MSEda, Norman C. Fost, MD, MPHb and Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPHa,c

a Department of Pediatrics, Section of Adolescent Medicine, University of Washington and Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
b Department of Pediatrics and Bioethics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
c Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute, Seattle, Washington

Social networking web sites are popular among adolescents and may represent a new venue for conducting adolescent health research. Conducting research by using social networking web sites raises several concerns, including the social value of this research, fair subject selection, confidentiality, privacy, and informed consent. Addressing each of these concerns, we offer an ethical framework to promote informed and appropriate decisions.

Key Words: social networking sites • ethics • Internet

Abbreviations: IRB—institutional review board

Accepted Oct 9, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A D Farmer, C E M Bruckner Holt, M J Cook, and S D Hearing
Social networking sites: a novel portal for communication
Postgrad. Med. J., September 1, 2009; 85(1007): 455 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
B. P. Jenssen, J. D. Klein, L. F. Salazar, N. A. Daluga, and R. J. DiClemente
Exposure to Tobacco on the Internet: Content Analysis of Adolescents' Internet Use
Pediatrics, August 1, 2009; 124(2): e180 - e186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. A. Moreno, A. VanderStoep, M. R. Parks, F. J. Zimmerman, A. Kurth, and D. A. Christakis
Reducing At-Risk Adolescents' Display of Risk Behavior on a Social Networking Web Site: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Intervention Trial
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2009; 163(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Ethical framework development
Emma L Angell
Pediatrics Online, 3 Jul 2008 [Full text]