Published online November 1, 2007
PEDIATRICS Vol. 120 No. 5 November 2007, pp. e1182-e1189 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-3526)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teitler, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Martinson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Teitler, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Martinson, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

A Cross-National Comparison of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Low Birth Weight in the United States and England

Julien O. Teitler, PhDa, Nancy E. Reichman, PhDb, Lenna Nepomnyaschy, PhDa and Melissa Martinson, MSWa

a School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, New York
b Department of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey

OBJECTIVE. We used 2 new nationally representative surveys to compare racial and ethnic differences in low birth weight in the United States and England.

METHODS. Risk factors and rates of low birth weight were compared across groups for singleton births within each country (white, black, Hispanic, Asian, and American Indian mothers in the United States; white, black, and Asian mothers in England). Crude rates and rates adjusted for socioeconomic status and behaviors were compared. Additional comparisons were limited to native-born mothers.

RESULTS. Racial and ethnic disparities in low birth weight are as large in England as in the United States. Socioeconomic status and behaviors explain little of the variation across racial and ethnic groups in either country.

CONCLUSIONS. Health disadvantages associated with being a minority do not seem to be a uniquely American phenomenon. Universal health care, as provided in the United Kingdom, alone may be insufficient to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in low birth weight.

Key Words: birth weight • racial disparities • ethnic disparities • international comparison

Abbreviations: SES—socioeconomic status • ECLS-B—Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey-Birth Cohort • MCS—New Millennium Cohort Study

Accepted Apr 25, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
Y. Kelly, L. Panico, M. Bartley, M. Marmot, J. Nazroo, and A. Sacker
Why does birthweight vary among ethnic groups in the UK? Findings from the Millennium Cohort Study
J. Public Health Med., March 1, 2009; 31(1): 131 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
H. Bauchner
Atoms
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2008; 93(1): i - i.
[Full Text] [PDF]