Published online September 3, 2007
PEDIATRICS Vol. 120 No. 4 October 2007, pp. e826-e831 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-3189)

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Opel, D. Articles by Diekema, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Opel, D. Articles by Diekema, D. Related Collections Office Practice Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

ARTICLE

Professionalism and the Match: A Pediatric Residency Program's Postinterview No-Call Policy and Its Impact on Applicants

Douglas Opel, MD^a,b, Richard Shugerman, MD^b, Heather McPhillips, MD, MPH^b, Wendy Sue Swanson, MD, MBe^b, Sarah Archibald, MD^b and Douglas Diekema, MD, MPH^a,b

^a Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
^b Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

OBJECTIVE. The National Residency Matching Program allows match participants to recruit each other and try to influence future ranking decisions in their favor, but it also states that participants "must not make statements implying commitment." The National Residency Matching Program cautions against statements such as, "We plan to rank you very highly on our list," because they can be misinterpreted as an informal commitment. To avoid issues around miscommunication, the University of Washington Pediatric Residency Program instituted a postinterview no-call policy with applicants. The purpose of this study was to determine this policy's impact on applicants.

METHODS. A Web-based, anonymous survey was sent after the National Residency Matching Program deadline for submitting rank lists but before match day to applicants who interviewed at our program from 2003 to 2006. Applicants were asked whether our program's position on their rank list would have been influenced more favorably, less favorably, or not at all had they received a telephone call from our program.

RESULTS. The survey response rate was 53% (n = 468). A total of 10.3% (n = 48) of the applicants to our program would have been favorably influenced by a telephone call after their interview. Significantly more applicants reported that a recruiting call from our program would have caused them to rank our program more favorably in 2006 (17.2%) than in 2003–2005 combined (8.4%).

CONCLUSIONS. We identified a vulnerable applicant population whose rank lists are potentially influenced by questionable postinterview communication from residency programs. To protect the integrity and fairness of the match, we call for more explicit guidelines regarding postinterview communication with applicants.

---

Key Words: ethics • medical education • medical student education • pediatric workforce

Abbreviations: NRMP—National Residency Matching Program

---

Accepted Feb 6, 2007.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. E. Fisher Manipulation and the Match JAMA, September 23, 2009; 302(12): 1266 - 1267. [Full Text] [PDF]