Published online October 1, 2007
PEDIATRICS Vol. 120 No. 4 October 2007, pp. 749-755 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-3293)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viner, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viner, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adolescent Medicine
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Do Adolescent Inpatient Wards Make a Difference? Findings From a National Young Patient Survey

Russell M. Viner, MB, PhD

Adolescent Medicine, General and Adolescent Paediatrics Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES. There is little evidence to support the effectiveness of adolescent inpatient wards. These analyses test the hypotheses that nursing young people in adolescent wards improves aspects of quality of care and patient satisfaction compared with child or adult wards.

PATIENTS AND METHODS. Secondary analyses of the national English Young Patient Survey 2004 were weighted to take account of variations in hospital size and response rate. Participants included 8855 subjects aged 12 to 17 years. Ward types (adolescent, child, and adult) were compared. Patient-reported quality-of-care indicators included rating by young people of overall care, respect, safety, confidentiality, communication, team-working, noise, and leisure facilities. Logistic regression models were adjusted for gender, disability, and previous hospital admissions.

RESULTS. Ten percent of 12- to 14-year-olds and 18% of 15- to 17-year-olds were nursed in an adolescent ward, 0.4% of 12- to 15-year-olds and 16% of 15- to 17-year-olds in an adult ward, with the remainder in a child ward. Compared with being in an adolescent ward, 15- to 17-year-olds were less likely to report excellent overall care in an adult ward and less likely to report feeling secure, having confidentiality maintained, feeling treated with respect, confidence in staff, appropriate information transmission, appropriate involvement in own care, and appropriate leisure facilities. Compared with being in an adolescent ward, 12- to 14-year-olds were less likely to report excellent overall care in a child ward and less likely to report feeling involved in their own care.

CONCLUSIONS. Dedicated adolescent inpatient wards improve aspects of quality of care for young people compared with child or adult wards, particularly for older adolescents. These data support the continued development of adolescent wards in larger general hospitals and children's hospitals.


Key Words: adolescence • inpatient • hospital • quality of care • health service research

Abbreviations: NHS—National Health Service


Accepted May 10, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATION AND PRACTICEHome page
D Hardoff, Y Danziger, G Reisler, N Stoffman, and A Ziv
Minding the gap: training in adolescent medicine when formal training programmes are not available
Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., October 1, 2009; 94(5): 157 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]