PEDIATRICS Vol. 120 No. 4 October 2007, pp. 715-722 (doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0325)
ARTICLE |
Assessing Procedural Skills Training in Pediatric Residency Programs
a Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan
b Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
c Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
d Office of Educational Affairs, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to assess the opinions of pediatric program directors regarding procedural skills training of pediatric residents.
METHODS. We developed a survey based on the Residency Review Committee's guidelines for procedural training. It included items about the importance of 29 procedures encountered in pediatric training, estimates of residents' competence in performing them, and the teaching of procedural skills. The survey was sent to members of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors. The primary outcome was the perceived importance for residents to achieve competence in these procedures, rated on a 10-point Likert scale. Secondary outcomes included perception of resident competence to perform procedures and educational methods used by respondents for teaching procedural skills. Associations between demographic characteristics and perceived importance or competence were also assessed.
RESULTS. Surveys were sent to 139 programs, and 112 responded. Thirteen procedures were rated 8 or higher by >75% of program directors. Seven skills that were prioritized by the Residency Review Committee did not achieve this level of consensus. Respondents reported that many residents failed to achieve competence by the end of training in 9 of 13 procedures that they rated as very important, including venipuncture, neonatal intubation, and administering injections. Residents who perform the majority of venipunctures and intravenous catheter placements at their institutions were more likely to be judged competent in performing these skills than residents who do not.
CONCLUSIONS. The Residency Review Committee's list of procedures does not necessarily reflect the opinions of pediatric program directors on the most essential skills for trainees. Many residents may not develop competence in several important procedures by the end of residency, most notably vascular access and life-saving skills. A more robust and standardized method is needed for teaching procedural skills and for documenting competence.
Key Words: procedures • clinical skills • pediatrics • residency • education
Abbreviations: RRC—Pediatric Residency Review Committee • APPD—Association of Pediatric Program Directors • PALS—Pediatric Advanced Life Support
Accepted Apr 30, 2007.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Rauch, D. Dowd, D. Eldridge, S. Mace, G. Schears, and K. Yen Peripheral Difficult Venous Access in Children Clinical Pediatrics, November 1, 2009; 48(9): 895 - 901. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. G. Gaies, S. A. Morris, J. P. Hafler, D. A. Graham, A. J. Capraro, J. Zhou, C. P. Landrigan, and T. J. Sandora Reforming Procedural Skills Training for Pediatric Residents: A Randomized, Interventional Trial Pediatrics, August 1, 2009; 124(2): 610 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Jones Jr, G. A. McGuinness, L. R. First, L. K. Leslie, and and the Residency Review and Redesign in Pediatric Linking Process to Outcome: Are We Training Pediatricians to Meet Evolving Health Care Needs? Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_1): S1 - S7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. G. Gaies, C. P. Landrigan, J. P. Hafler, and T. J. Sandora Assessing Procedural Skills Training in Pediatric Residency Programs: In Reply Pediatrics, March 1, 2008; 121(3): 650 - 651. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
