Published online March 1, 2007
PEDIATRICS Vol. 119 Supplement March 2007, pp. S145-S149 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2023G)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilsanz, V.
Right arrow Articles by Wren, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilsanz, V.
Right arrow Articles by Wren, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Therapeutics & Toxicology

SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE


Assessment of Bone Acquisition in Childhood and Adolescence

Vicente Gilsanz, MD, PhDa and Tishya Wren, PhDb

a Radiology Department
b Division of Orthopedics, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Availability, ease of use, relative low cost, and minimal radiation exposure have made dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry the most widely used technique worldwide to obtain bone measurements for both research and clinical purposes in pediatric populations. However, errors related to growth and maturity significantly diminish the accuracy of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry bone measurements. Several investigators have found that dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in children frequently leads to a misdiagnosis of osteoporosis and an underestimation of the amount of bone. In this regard, a recent official position paper by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry states that subjects <20 years of age should not be given a diagnosis of osteoporosis on the basis of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry criteria. Nevertheless, the increased awareness that osteoporosis has its antecedents in childhood and the demand for examinations of bone acquisition and response to therapy stress the urgent need to improve the value of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements for children.

Key Words: dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry • DXA • osteoporosis • pediatrics • QCT

Abbreviations: BMC—bone mineral content • DXA—dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry • BMD—bone mineral density • aBMD—areal bone mineral density • CT—computed tomography • QCT—quantitative computed tomography

Accepted Oct 5, 2006.