Published online May 1, 2007
PEDIATRICS Vol. 119 No. 5 May 2007, pp. 975-982 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2006-1565)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Profit, J.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Profit, J.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, L. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

SPECIAL ARTICLE

Implementing Pay-for-Performance in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Jochen Profit, MD, MPHa,b, John A. F. Zupancic, MD, ScDc, Jeffrey B. Gould, MD, MPHd,e and Laura A. Petersen, MD, MPHb,f

a Section of Neonatology, Texas Children's Hospital
f Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
b Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies, Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
c Harvard Neonatal Perinatal Medicine Program, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
d California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto, California
e Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California

Pay-for-performance initiatives in medicine are proliferating rapidly. Neonatal intensive care is a likely target for these efforts because of the high cost, available databases, and relative strength of evidence for at least some measures of quality. Pay-for-performance may improve patient care but requires valid measurements of quality to ensure that financial incentives truly support superior performance. Given the existing uncertainty with respect to both the effectiveness of pay-for-performance and the state of quality measurement science, experimentation with pay-for-performance initiatives should proceed with caution and in controlled settings. In this article, we describe approaches to measuring quality and implementing pay-for-performance in the NICU setting.

Key Words: pay-for-performance programs • quality improvement

Abbreviations: QI—quality improvement • IOM—Institute of Medicine • OECD—Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development • CPQCC—California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative

Accepted Dec 20, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. T. Chien and R. A. Dudley
Pay-for-Performance in Pediatrics: Proceed With Caution
Pediatrics, July 1, 2007; 120(1): 186 - 188.
[Full Text] [PDF]