Advertising Disclaimer
Published online June 22, 2007
PEDIATRICS Vol. 119 No. 3 March 2007, pp. e637-e642 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1323)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korn, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gofin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Korn, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gofin, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

How Children With Special Needs Travel With Their Parents: Observed Versus Reported Use of Vehicle Restraints

Taube Korn, MS, OTRa,b, Michal Katz-Leurer, PT, PhDa, Shirley Meyer, MDa, Rosa Gofin, MD, MPHb

a Alyn Hospital, Pediatric and Adolescent Rehabilitation Center, Jerusalem, Israel
b Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine of the Hebrew University and Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel

OBJECTIVES. The difficulties entailed in transporting children with special physical and behavioral needs could influence child restraint misuse and nonuse within this population. Although parental interview is often used to assess child vehicle restraint use, little research had been performed to validate this approach, and none has been done in the special-needs population. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of nonuse and misuse of child restraints in the special-needs population and to assess the validity of using parental report as a measure of child restraint use.

METHODS. Restraint use in 115 children with special needs, aged 0 to 18 years, was observed on their arrival at the parking lot of the Alyn Hospital Pediatric Rehabilitation Center in Jerusalem. The observation noted type of restraint used or absence thereof. If a restraint was used, correct use/misuse was recorded. In 94 cases, the parents were interviewed later that day in the clinic.

RESULTS. Seventy percent of the children were observed as traveling unrestrained or with a restraint that was grossly misused to the extent that it provided no meaningful protection. The remaining children were observed displaying a variety of errors in the selection or use of the restraint that compromised their safety to varying degrees. Analysis of the observation results versus parental reporting revealed a 44% overreporting of child restraint use. Sensitivity was 71%, and specificity was 86%.

CONCLUSIONS. The high prevalence of restraint nonuse and misuse within the special-needs population defines this as a population at risk and emphasizes the need for intervention. Cautious interpretation is required of information acquired from parental reporting of child restraint use. The results of this study should raise awareness among professionals working with children with special needs as to the need for tailored assessment and intervention in the area of child-passenger safety.

Key Words: child-passenger safety • special needs • validity • car seats • disabilities

Abbreviations: CRS—child restraint system • OT—occupational therapy • CPS—child-passenger safety • PPV—positive predictive value • NPV—negative predictive value • SES—socioeconomic status

Accepted Sep 19, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?