PEDIATRICS Vol. 119 No. 1 January 2007, pp. e124-e130 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1222)
ARTICLE |
Lactobacillus reuteri (American Type Culture Collection Strain 55730) Versus Simethicone in the Treatment of Infantile Colic: A Prospective Randomized Study
Department of Pediatrics, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
OBJECTIVE. The goal was to test the hypothesis that oral administration of Lactobacillus reuteri in a prospective randomized study would improve symptoms of infantile colic.
METHODS. Ninety breastfed colicky infants were assigned randomly to receive either the probiotic L reuteri (108 live bacteria per day) or simethicone (60 mg/day) each day for 28 days. The mothers avoided cow's milk in their diet. Parents monitored daily crying times and adverse effects by using a questionnaire.
RESULTS. Eighty-three infants completed the trial: 41 in the probiotic group and 42 in the simethicone group. The infants were similar regarding gestational age, birth weight, gender, and crying time at baseline. Daily median crying times in the probiotic and simethicone groups were 159 minutes/day and 177 minutes/day, respectively, on the seventh day and 51 minutes/day and 145 minutes/day on the 28th day. On day 28, 39 patients (95%) were responders in the probiotic group and 3 patients (7%) were responders in the simethicone group. No adverse effects were reported.
CONCLUSIONS. In our cohort, L reuteri improved colicky symptoms in breastfed infants within 1 week of treatment, compared with simethicone, which suggests that probiotics may have a role in the treatment of infantile colic.
Key Words: gut microflora Lactobacillus reuteri simethicone infantile colic
Accepted Aug 8, 2006.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Minocha Probiotics for Preventive Health Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2009; 24(2): 227 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cohen-Silver and S. Ratnapalan Management of Infantile Colic: A Review Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 48(1): 14 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Whitehead, J. Versalovic, S. Roos, and R. A. Britton Genomic and Genetic Characterization of the Bile Stress Response of Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 15, 2008; 74(6): 1812 - 1819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lehman Evidently . . . Evid. Based Med., April 1, 2007; 12(2): 35 - 35. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Other articles noted Evid. Based Med., April 1, 2007; 12(2): 63 - 64. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kemp Lactobacillus reuteri lessens symptoms of infantile colic AAP News, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 2 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A New Treatment for Colic? Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, January 24, 2007; 2007(124): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A New Treatment for Colic? Journal Watch (General), January 18, 2007; 2007(118): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||











